7:44 - You folded bottom pair to the river bet after it goes check-check on the 2 previous streets. Looking in PIO it seems like OOP calls 4x with the Ace and Q blockers but folds the other ones. I suppose it's because they are blockers to the straight, but should we consider it in game or just fold any 4x? Shouldn't we assume villain would've bet AQ at either flop or turn?
23:39 - You decided to check-raise KQ. PIO basically never check-raises with only top pair and check-raises just 7% against the 50% c-bet. Was that a read on the villain/population?
24:08 - Facing a check-raise from villain, you decided to fold the gutshot pointing out villain had a very low check-raising frequency. PIO folds the gutshots without the bdfd in that spot. Should we continue with these hands because of the implied odds or just fold since like you said in the video we might be dead already?
25:08 - You pointed out that on that flop it was more appropriate to use a sizing between 50% - 75%. Does it have anything to do with the fact that both players were deep or do you advocate that sizing 100BB deep as well?
7.44, yea pbb because we block the street, but people never check AQ on flop and turn so its not relevant anymore. I think folding any 4x is good(I doubt people are bluffing enough in his spot)
because of his range. he has Kx and flush draw that fold to the river but can easy bluff after a check. also he has Ax that shove to a river check. what do you think? (I'm not sure and sorry for my English, I can 't use PIO to check that hand...TY)
We don't know if he folds Kx vs a shove. I think we will see some calls from Kx. And I dont think they will 100% bet Ax if we check. If we are in his spot and we have A2, I would check it vs most players.(its hard to get called by worse)
@16:15 You say we have to call with AK against his turn bet because he has a lot of gutshots and open enders... which i agree with but once the jack river hits and he never puts us on a jack dont you think he will just bet again with all those draws?? i think AK should call the river in this spot, can you explain the fold?
also @22:30 with villian only having $31 behind i think betting $12 on the turn lead is too big. Even if you bet like $6 and he calls he still has less than a pot size river shove. I know youd never be balanced with a small turn lead but i dont think it matters, your hand is too strong to scare him off. Maybe im wrong though :)
If we bet bigger on turn----> pot on river will be bigger-----> better pot odds for him----> way more likely he will always call his Kx. Thats my reason:)
Loading 13 Comments...
Hello Dekkers.
Do you always open all your small pocket pairs from UTG? How do you act facing a 3bet 100bbs deep?
Yes on 90% of the tables I will open them, unless the players behind me are 3 betting a ton. Facing a 3bet I would fold often.
Hello Dekkers,
Got some questions on some points of the video:
7:44 - You folded bottom pair to the river bet after it goes check-check on the 2 previous streets. Looking in PIO it seems like OOP calls 4x with the Ace and Q blockers but folds the other ones. I suppose it's because they are blockers to the straight, but should we consider it in game or just fold any 4x? Shouldn't we assume villain would've bet AQ at either flop or turn?
23:39 - You decided to check-raise KQ. PIO basically never check-raises with only top pair and check-raises just 7% against the 50% c-bet. Was that a read on the villain/population?
24:08 - Facing a check-raise from villain, you decided to fold the gutshot pointing out villain had a very low check-raising frequency. PIO folds the gutshots without the bdfd in that spot. Should we continue with these hands because of the implied odds or just fold since like you said in the video we might be dead already?
25:08 - You pointed out that on that flop it was more appropriate to use a sizing between 50% - 75%. Does it have anything to do with the fact that both players were deep or do you advocate that sizing 100BB deep as well?
Thanks and nice video!
7.44, yea pbb because we block the street, but people never check AQ on flop and turn so its not relevant anymore. I think folding any 4x is good(I doubt people are bluffing enough in his spot)
23:39 yea I think the pool is not balanced with that 50% betsize---> we can raise more for value
hi dekkers, min 3:40 aq river action: (snap)check is better then shove?
Why do you think checking is better?
because of his range. he has Kx and flush draw that fold to the river but can easy bluff after a check. also he has Ax that shove to a river check. what do you think? (I'm not sure and sorry for my English, I can 't use PIO to check that hand...TY)
We don't know if he folds Kx vs a shove. I think we will see some calls from Kx. And I dont think they will 100% bet Ax if we check. If we are in his spot and we have A2, I would check it vs most players.(its hard to get called by worse)
@16:15 You say we have to call with AK against his turn bet because he has a lot of gutshots and open enders... which i agree with but once the jack river hits and he never puts us on a jack dont you think he will just bet again with all those draws?? i think AK should call the river in this spot, can you explain the fold?
I dont think a lot of regs will see this river as a good bluf card. GTO wise its 50/50 with AKo
also @22:30 with villian only having $31 behind i think betting $12 on the turn lead is too big. Even if you bet like $6 and he calls he still has less than a pot size river shove. I know youd never be balanced with a small turn lead but i dont think it matters, your hand is too strong to scare him off. Maybe im wrong though :)
If we bet bigger on turn----> pot on river will be bigger-----> better pot odds for him----> way more likely he will always call his Kx. Thats my reason:)
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.