2 Table $2.5/$5 6-Max Zoom NLHE and PIO review
Posted by Juan Copani
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 12 Comments...
turned it off after 1st hand flop. 1. You don't have nut advantage 2. You cannot cbet 100% frequency small sizing just because you would have nut advantage, you would need to use bigger sizings, at least half pot because you want to mix up your nuts with some bluffs, and 100% of range is not correct amount to do so, and your sizing tells you are cbeting 100% of your range and it is easily exploitable 3. KQTr hits you both similarly, opponents just has less sets, unless you have reads hes a monkey and completes wayyy too wide, and you dont. Sorry If I am being rude, dont mean to be
hey AO,
It is difficult to open a constructive discussion if you are going to close me at the first hand you dislike any of my plays.. anyway!
i actually do have a decent equity advantage on this board. I just checked it, 57% eq against a standard ~30% defending range on MP... Beeing 100bb deep i think its always a good idea to put pressure with lot of your equity by small sizing before you start polarizing your range.on future streets. With my flop size i also induce AJo to raise a lot on the flop, and thats good for me to play turns against a very capped range.
Its possible that a variety of sizings could apply to this flop, but as more sizings you implement, more difficult its to execute your strategy, so simplify its an option in poker as long this does not kill your overall ev on the spot.
I didnt claim that we should cbet 100% here, even if it could be true against some models where OOP is overfolding. But cbetting a high frecquency its the best way to go.
And yes, strategies that try to exploit becomes exploitable.. True fact !
yea agreed vs 30% complete range, Im a nit and I defend 21% :( with that equity advantage seems reasonable :) and yes, agree with your last sentence 100% percent, Its just that opponent can c/r any backdoor FD less than pot sizing and you will have to fold 12% of lets say your 30% percent opening range, but if its not 100% cbet strategy then I was completely wrong. P.S. never posting comments while drunk again :D
Hi Juan – thanks for the video – Nice Format (would also work well if it was live play with the PIO analysis). I don’t think very many people will be folding a set at that stack depth, but if you are deeper it’s certainly a lot more likely.
8:42 – Can you just give a little bit of detail about the pros and cons to bet 17 into the pot of 26 instead of a smaller bet size? Are you barreling the turn a lot if he calls flop? And if he calls turn, what about river shoving range?
How often would he need to fold hands such as QQ to 1010 or small suited aces on the flop to make the larger bet size profitable?
hello Bryan,
8:42 i do have a huge equity advantage on a board like this, and my range is pretty narrow, there are not that many hands that id be specially interested on betting small in this specific case.
When he calls the flop i think there are not that much fold equity on the turn, so if i choose to bluff i would care more about my blockers. Same on the river.
Id say he always need to fold such weak hands like QQ-TT against a large bet on the flop.
@Juan Copani " i do have a huge equity advantage on a board like this, and my range is pretty narrow, there are not that many hands that id be specially interested on betting small in this specific case."
First very good Video. I like how you explain your Hands.
One Hand I dont unterstand 99 at the Board AK8 rainbow. You said you will c-bet 100% with your range because you are EQ Fav and Nut-Adv. And you range is very tight preflop. I am 100% agree. But I dont unterstand you size. It is big and you didnt explain why. I would bet small because you bet 100% and you SPR is also small. You get it in at three streets.
hey pinky,
take a look here above, we are discussing same hand..
9:50 right table AQ hand. What do u think just check/jammnig turn instead of raising...with Ah.. so much equity and so little bluffs. He calls with all the flush .. K Kh .. maybe T Th, fold AK AA, KQ, may be KTs. By raising on the turn, once he called ... i think he won't fold on a non-heart river due to pot odds. What do u think of the play of applying max pressure on turn, he does not have majority of chips invested yet? Or do u think it's a bad play making him playing perfectly? Thx.
And what do you think of just playing passively with check/c on the turn?
Very smart and clear thought processes.
- 2:30) AKo on QTKr 7x. I like the turn sizing, but since you play even KQ like this, would you only overbet TT/AJ/J9 and some bluffs? Also, for this small sizings, which are the bluffs you would use OTT?
-Interesting AhQx analysis, assuming you were 200bb effective, do you think your statements still imply or do you think with more fold equity on some part of his range bc deeper, having the Ah becomes better then Jhx or Qhx?
Great Video, I especially liked the Pio part. I think there are plenty of zoom 500 live play videos out there so I really appreciate a more in depth analyse video. Looking forward to see more of your session review + pio analysis videos.
Juan Copani nice Vid!
1st hand :/
I dont understand your small size.
You have a really good range advangages here
AJ J9 20c + 9c combos of sets
14/23 combos of two pair
So at least 43 combos.
Is necessary here split our range and bet big/small?
Best hand for 3barell bluff are Ax? Ty
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.