Out Now
×

$1/$2 6-Max Zoom PLO (part 1)

Posted by

You’re watching:

$1/$2 6-Max Zoom PLO (part 1)

user avatar

Leszek Badurowicz

Essential Pro

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Duration -:-
Remaining Time 0:00
  • descriptions off, selected

Resume Video

Start from Beginning

Watch Video

Replay Video

10

You’re watching:

$1/$2 6-Max Zoom PLO (part 1)

user avatar

Leszek Badurowicz

POSTED Dec 19, 2015

Responding to the comments section from previous videos, Leszek lowers the number of tables to 2 in an attempt to go into more detail on the interesting hands.

10 Comments

Loading 10 Comments...

Zuzupet 9 years, 3 months ago

Nice video. Really like this format, think this combined with the pokerjuice analysis is the most efficient stuff you can teach us, maybe in the ratio 66:33 % of 2 tables session reviews and Pokerjuice analysis. :D thanks

Christopher George 9 years, 2 months ago

at 30:12 where you talk about triple barreling with the AT98ss hand, what about x/ring turn? Blocking the 8 isn't totally insignificant, and I feel like he should be raising a decent portion of sets on flop on the fairly wet board, so he will have a hard time calling AK type hands.He can float us with a Kx with a gutter and better and bet turn, check back river. It's nice to have a stronger checking range on turn here because of that, but I would like to know what would be the best x/r bluff hand here on turn? Certainly this could be a candidate?

Leszek Badurowicz 9 years, 2 months ago

@creamr1ses Against some players it might be a good play. Especially with those with flop raise stat [because they would raise most of their sets] and high turn aggression. Those players should be betting with hands like Q8, AKT, AKJ, QJT, naked JT or JT9.
However after 264 hands this our opponent seems to be on the passive side. His flop raise is 13%, AF => 1,6 and A% => 22%. Very often players like this bet with stronger range. They check back AKJ, KJT, QJT and bet Q8/K8+ or very strong draws and a few weaker hands. Of course we need to remember that we cant be results oriented and analyse our line from a showdown perspective ;-)
Your line is very interesting but I would use it against different type of opponent.

Kasabian 9 years, 2 months ago

Leszek, 23:02 u fold t864ds on sb, is it standard play?

Leszek Badurowicz 9 years, 2 months ago

Yeah, it's gonna be 3-way or 4-way pot. We don't have any nut potential. We have the worst absolute and relative position. Imo our hand can only put us in trouble if we make mid/low flush. For me it's a very standard fold on the SB.

Infestus176 8 years, 8 months ago

I think we should still be leading turn with our eq and range advantage vs rsmig. Not having a pair our showdown value isn't strong enough.

Rival_Dealer 8 years ago

Hello Leszek. I was kinda surprised by your fold on the BTN @ 07:24 on table #1 with KQJ6r. Is that because the SB seems like a reg and has fairly agressive stats?

Leszek Badurowicz 8 years ago

Yes. 3 reasons for that
1) Our hand is rainbow so it doesnt have a great playability
2) SB has 20% 3bet against BTN and we dont want to face a 3bet with this hand as very often we will be dominated
3) BB is not really overfolding against a BTN steal

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy