While both players should have reasonably strong ranges, folding a T here is out of the question. You'd have to give 1 of them an extremely tight range for this to be a fold.

Just because we will have some awkward decisions on future streets, doesn't mean we should fold. Part of playing poker very well includes being willing to be put into some tough spots.

Any specific issues with it?

Do you dislike my play style, the way I analyzed hands, HH reviews in general, showing every hand in a HH?

Hey Jans, I don't mean to come off as if I discredit your opinion, as there is nothing wrong with believing the video is not elite level content. However, it is not constructive to make blanket negative statements in comments. A specific critique would be appreciated, both from the viewers and the video producer, and with that, we can get some discussion going.

Allright then. First of all you sound like an imbecile trying to teach something to a bunch of monkeys. Just listen to the first 20 second
and you'll know what I mean. It's not my biggest concern but it sure doesn't help when evaluating this video.

Will just point out the biggest mistakes (in my opinion):
4:27 - 98o in the HJ pretty close pre ante? You are absolutely clueless
about pre ante preflop ranges it seems.
4:57 - overlimping KTo 300b+ vs a reg where you admit to having no reason what his limpingrange is.
15:47 - basically everything you say about this hand
24:10 - if you are deeper you bluff here to fold out AA/AK, really? Explain please.
27:46 - 87o 3b vs BTN 2.5x vs a reg. "Great playability", you do know there's suited hands right? How much are you even 3betting
in this spot, like 40-45% of hands? You assume he has a high RFI and high fold to 3b based on nothing.
38:40 - "As a general rule of thumb you should almost always 3bet pocket aces". Some elite stuff right there.
40:15 - You are 3betting low offsuit kings at this stackdepth. Why do you think this is good?

There's a lot more, mostly things you say during the video that makes me think you have no idea what you are talking about.
I also think its a pretty poor format just clicking through the hands and only relying on your own authority rather than using software/stats to back up what you are saying. This is not even close to elite content, to be honest I don't even think this would qualify as essential.

I am sorry to call you out and you probably did your best, but this was just not good enough.

I apologize if you weren't able to understand some of the situations I encountered through my explanations. I'll answer your questions to these situations in a more indepth manner, so you may do so.

1. 89o: As I folded here, and explained in the video as to why, it is fairly obvious that having 89o in a typical opening range here would be bad. However, opening ranges should shift significantly based on opponent play styles and ability. As in this situation I have 2 good regs in the blinds, opening here this loose would be a mistake, although a very marginal one, as the opponents in late position are both weak recreational players. If the opponent in the big blind was also a weak recreational player, opening this would not be a mistake (although is marginal and requires a skilled player to do so, it is not something i'd suggest for my weaker students).

2. KTo: I admit, I haven't encountered C.Darwin in long enough time to know if he is playing properly balanced here or not. So his limp range could be weak enough and face up enough where we can iso KTo, or it is balanced enough and strong enough where doing so would be a mistake. If I had my full database when I had access to this HH, maybe I could have figured that out. As I am uncertain as to how weak his limp range is here, but I know it can be fairly weak, open folding this might be fine, but would likely be a mistake (unless he is balanced). Honestly I'm not 100% certain as whether or not we should fold, over limp, or iso this as it depends entirely on what his range looks like. If this was a later stage situation with this degree of uncertainty I would certainly fold. As I explained in the video, I wasn't 100% certain, and I am still not, as I don't have enough information on this exact opponent.

3. 89o defend at 15min42sec: While you said you dislike everything I said here, I am certain we both agree this is a defend. As to post flop: Folding this flop with this hand would be a mistake, check raising it would also be a mistake due to how many combos we'd have in our range. If you desired to have a check raising range here (which im not a huge fan of) you'd need hands like 89s, T8s, T9s, QTs, type hands, and thus need to balance it by check raising 22/77/J2s/J7/AJ, issue with this is that it weakens our calling range. Thus vs a good reg, I'd rather not have a check raising range here. However, just because we shouldn't have a check raising range here vs good regs, doesn't mean we can't check raise weak opponents who will fold way too often to our check raise, and who we don't have to be balanced against. As To River: I'd agree if you thought I should upsize a little, honestly I'd slightly prefer around 230-260, but isn't a big deal. The rest of what I said in the video is accurate, and if you believe a much larger sizing should be used, the issue with doing so is we'd have too many bluffs relative to our fairly small value range.

4. AKo 22min: I apologize as this is a very indepth situation and due to time contraints I wont be able to properly explain in depth why we can turn AK into a bluff on the turn if much deeper, but it essentially comes down to: I believe this opponent will barrel QQ always, and hands like KQo, 86s, K8s, etc type 2p's as well, thus when our oppoent checks to us, he has 1 KK combo(maybe, might barrel it), 3 AA combos (might barrel these tho, so i'd remove some), and 6 AK combos. Of this range, AK is only hand I believe he checks 100% on this turn, thus when he checks to us here, we can be very certain his main hand is AK, and as we can have all KQ, all QQ, and KK combos, and represent a lot of rivered straight/flush, if we are deep enough we can barrel large here to set up a river jam, however I'd want to be able to jam at least .75+ psb on the river in order to have enough FE vs AK.

5. 78o 3b 27min: You seem not to understand how a 3b bluff range here should look, I'll build one for you, so you can see it's not 40% (No idea as to where you got this number from).
   Value range :88+,ATs+,KQs,AJo+ = 7.4%
   Bluff range: A5s-A2s,K8s-K6s,Q8s-Q7s,J8s-J7s,T7s-T6s,96s+,86s+,75s+,65s,KTo,QTo,JTo,T9o,98o,87o = 11.8%
   Thus a total of 19.3%
   As you don't seem to understand basic range construction here, I'll explain why I'm using a range like this.
   All of the hands in this range have enough playability post flop, and board coverage, to all be fine as 3b bluffs here. You may notice it isn't a balanced range, well, as I explain in the video, I dont expect my opponent to be opening correctly on the button, and thus I expect them to be folding wayyyy too often to my 3b here, thus while a 12% bluff range compared to 7.5% value range may in general be too bluff heavy, in this exact scenario it isn't, and actually there are many opponents whom you may 3b much much wider here verse. I realize I can go much much more indepth here, as you seem to not understand this basic concept very well, please let me know if you need more clarification.

6. AA: Yes, GTO wise you should almost always 3b AA, that being said, there are plenty of situations in which you should heavily deviate from GTO and instead not have a 3b range at all, or have one that is instead very bluff heavy.

7. You don't need to 3b low off suit kings here, you can peel them as well. Your 3b bluff range in this spot should include hands that are fine defends, that don't have amazing playability. A 3b bluff range can include:

   T5s-T2s,94s-92s,84s-82s,73s-72s,64s-62s,53s-52s,42s+,32s,K5o-K2o,Q8o-Q6o,J7o,T7o-T6o,97o-96o,86o-85o,75o,64o+,54o

While this is a very loose range, I'm not advocating 3b all of them always, just giving you a basic idea as to what we can 3b here. If you need to be helped out more in this scenario, feel free to ask questions.

I hope this clarifies any misunderstandings you seem to have had. The manner in which I did this HH review is very similar to how I do my coaching sessions for my more advanced students. I expect those students to have a strong foundation for their games, thus I don't need to go as indepth into very basic situations. In the future I'll go more indepth, so all students who have access to Elite content may understand my reviews.

I made my comment to point out that the amount and quality of elite content has been declining, and you are the perfect example. It wasn't personal. I am not going to point out all the obvious mistakes in the stuff you posted above because frankly it's a waste of time and after all I don't get paid to post here. I think you really overestimate your own ability in online MTTs.

Also my 14 y/o sister has a better 3betting range from the SB than the one you came up with. So shout out to her.

Yeah, i'll fix that in next vid.

I apologize if you find a 1k nlhe HH review boring.

In videos I try to coach in a very simple and easy to follow manner as I expect a wide range of skill abilities to be watching these. I'll go more in depth in the next one.

I have, my video is very similar to theirs, and level of play and review is higher or similar to all 3 of those guys videos.

I agree that antyhing sauce/galfond post makes me work harder on my game. I realize the user content is very skilled, this is why I didn't go in depth in very basic situations. There wasn't a single spot I had that I felt was worth an in depth look, maybe I'm wrong tho and i should go more in depth in these fairly basic situations.

lol its an insult to say this should be essential video to all essential coaches.
If you compare that to someone like apotheosis who also did many essential vids... I mean thats a complete joke then no offense