12 Table $.50/$1 and $1/$2 Full Ring NLHE Session Review (part 3)
Posted by Julian Kopanskiy
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 6 Comments...
Hey Julian nice video man :) had a question in regards to playing multiple tables & tightening up/not taking marginal spots that aren't going to be massively +EV
I struggle to 5-6 table reg tables (no zoom on sites i play), i find that i can't focus properly given all the things going on and i find myself not being able to handle playing a lot of marginal spots all at once (and it tends to stress me out esp when my timebank runs out or the site just auto-folds me).
So i was wondering when you decide to play more tables do you have to end up just playing tighter in general, i'm playing the micros/smaller stakes atm so i think i could get away with this strategy but idk... was wondering your thoughts?
It's totally ok to avoid marginal spots, especially at micro stakes, because your profit will mostly come from recreational players who will make huge mistakes.
To play a lot of tables, you need to know your general strategy in most common spots. So this requires a bit off table work. What is your opening ranges, 3bet ranges vs different positions and or percentages, what you cbet, what check behind...
And you need to know your hud and pop ups very well to be able to find important info quickly.
All this will come with practice, and after reviewing a ton of your hands!!
Usually 5-6tables of full ring is very slow. Smth like 300h/hr. This should be easy to play. Maybe when you face a tough decision you are not analyzing arguments for different lines, but just hesitating between available options. It means that you need to anylize more of this spots while not playing.
Gl, keep practicing and world of full ring will be yours!!
Thanks for the helpful reply!, i think i need to work on using my HUD better for sure.
###
Haha full-ring... i find that you get into a lot more MW pots with full-ring esp as stacks get deeper which is an area that is sort of yet to be explored, in regards to the 66 hand on KdKs8d do you just end up checking more of your range the more OOP you are assuming you had Kx there and BU has high c-bet do you prefer a bet or x-raise?
Like when i'm in a MW pot OOP i struggle what to do, such as if the other villain's in the hand are very stationy and i'm 1st to act do i just want to be betting for value or xing my whole range (if there are spots where someone will have a high cbet and someone will over-call, x-raising becomes more favorable then betting).
Regarding 66 hand. It's a bit of exploitative play since we have recreational pfr. Usually i would be betting my Kx here, and some bluffs. My checks will be 66-TT, maybe 88s full house.
If you are pfr OOP, in a MW pot, there could be quite different scenarios:
-vs regs i would check my whole range usually
-vs agr rec players, and regs i would also check quite a lot
-if we have a bunch of straight forward regs and passive station, i would go exploitative: bet strong hands, check mediocre SD value
Hi Julian. 77 at 13mins. What are you using as bluffs here, 88/99?
Yes it seems that 88-99 are only bluff candidates. But it depends if he can fold KK+ at the river.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.