Nice work...interesting spots and I like that you take the time to analyze the actions of both hero and villain. I think this format where you look at 3-4 hands vs the same opponent with Pio is very good with respect to designing your overall strat.
One idea ( to expand upon your GTO analysis) might be to try to find a couple hands (vs the same villain) and examine if and when you may want to diverge from the GTO line as an exploit to a villain leak or tendency.
In the first hand (flush complete turn after XR) Pio tends to prefer to use an even smaller bet size than you included on the turn. I ran a sim myself and Pio bets around 50% of the time when I include 38% pot bet and almost only uses that size.
It’s very likely that an smaller size like the one you used or even a blockbet it’s the one that’s gonna retain the most EV on this particular spot because it will allow us to keep protection betting most of our value range on the flop and keep generating folds from hands that will put us on a difficult spot on a wide variety of river cards at the same time.
Denying equity counts for something, whether it be Villain’s raw hand equity or their future fold equity that could be profitable vs our range. While it may not be technically GTO in such spots, we can and should reflect upon human motifs and play patterns in order to integrate those with solver play. Don’t have a cow, man. Focus on learning something from a successful player, and be grateful for his response to a member question (notice how he didn’t reply to you). You make my experience worse on the site, not Nuno.
17:56 nuno u say ur suprised to see 9x fold and ur like yeah i suppose the lower ones, however its also saying to fold K9 Q9 and A9 if im not mistaken? whats youre thoughts on that? Also why is it that we would almost never overbet on a spade turn?
Yeah you’re right. A9, K9 and Q9 are also high frequency folds since they block a decent part of out bluffing range (A2, A3, K8, K6, Q8)
We don’t tend to overbet on turns where the flush gets there because our opponent remains completely uncapped after having check called the flop and we benefit from extracting value from a wider range by betting smaller.
Loading 11 Comments...
another very interesting video!!!! ty
Glad you liked it Biribiri. Thanks for the support.
Nice work...interesting spots and I like that you take the time to analyze the actions of both hero and villain. I think this format where you look at 3-4 hands vs the same opponent with Pio is very good with respect to designing your overall strat.
One idea ( to expand upon your GTO analysis) might be to try to find a couple hands (vs the same villain) and examine if and when you may want to diverge from the GTO line as an exploit to a villain leak or tendency.
Thanks for the kind words erc.
I think that’s a good idea, will keep it in mind for future videos.
Nice video!
In the first hand (flush complete turn after XR) Pio tends to prefer to use an even smaller bet size than you included on the turn. I ran a sim myself and Pio bets around 50% of the time when I include 38% pot bet and almost only uses that size.
Hey Kalupso, thanks for the heads up!
It’s very likely that an smaller size like the one you used or even a blockbet it’s the one that’s gonna retain the most EV on this particular spot because it will allow us to keep protection betting most of our value range on the flop and keep generating folds from hands that will put us on a difficult spot on a wide variety of river cards at the same time.
'putting us in a difficult spot' has absolutely no relevance on gto or a pio output, christ this site is going downhill
Denying equity counts for something, whether it be Villain’s raw hand equity or their future fold equity that could be profitable vs our range. While it may not be technically GTO in such spots, we can and should reflect upon human motifs and play patterns in order to integrate those with solver play. Don’t have a cow, man. Focus on learning something from a successful player, and be grateful for his response to a member question (notice how he didn’t reply to you). You make my experience worse on the site, not Nuno.
Thanks for the support Gingivite.
He’s just a hater. Best thing we can do is just ignore him.
17:56 nuno u say ur suprised to see 9x fold and ur like yeah i suppose the lower ones, however its also saying to fold K9 Q9 and A9 if im not mistaken? whats youre thoughts on that? Also why is it that we would almost never overbet on a spade turn?
Yeah you’re right. A9, K9 and Q9 are also high frequency folds since they block a decent part of out bluffing range (A2, A3, K8, K6, Q8)
We don’t tend to overbet on turns where the flush gets there because our opponent remains completely uncapped after having check called the flop and we benefit from extracting value from a wider range by betting smaller.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.