Triple Threat: $100 Zoom, PIO Solver, and a Live Session
Posted by Dekkers
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 7 Comments...
why you ran pio with two different sizings when in game you use only one? Don't you think it will skew results of the hand? in Q1088 sim example, pio flop cbet range w bigger sizing is pretty much 2p+ and bluffs so when you get to the turn with such a strong range it make sense that pio will barrel 70%+ because most of that range beat pure trips
True, in this example I should use 1 size
think the live session is not needed, we will have a better learning experience from hand reviews
+1
I think it's always interesting to hear live thinking process
In one of the hands you have T8o in bb and defend vs 3bb open. You call flop bet on AT9r then checked back on the turn. PIo also shows a check here. My question is, don't you cap your range and allow villain to value bet easily on bricks? Would you check back Ax on the turn? I think you can block bet turn for 33% and check back a lot of rivers. What do you think? Instead you face a 66% river bet which sb can do with QT+ here imo.
I think the turn block will be easier for villain to raise and put us in a tough spot since few value hands that want to double barrel would choose this small size, check back with the Tx and bluff catch/fold depending on the river size chosen by villain. check back weaker Ax is a good option to protect our check range going to the river.
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.