$10/$20 and $3/$6 Live Session w/ PIO
Posted by Juan Pastor
Video Player is loading.
This is a modal window.
The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Resume Video
Start from Beginning
Watch Video
10
Loading 17 Comments...
Hi there nice video
In the final hand analysis with 45cc vs a 16pc 3bettor from the BB I see you've used snowy ranges for IP, but surely we should widen our 4b range here to include hands like AQs TTs and even some SCs? playing flat with everything except AA-JJ AK and some suited wheel aces seem incorrect
Hi beijingsnake,
I don't think this changes affect the sim at all, there are just very small changes in the range
Think in end of the video you have too tight defending range vs 3bet. defending 13% seems too tight and opponent size wasn't huge, well if you raise 40% that's fine.
Jeff_ min?
talking about pio solvers range (defending button)
Im asking the time!
Aouch sorry 46minute 46 second
13% is the range I'm calling, not the frequency. A std BU open is close to 40%, so calling 13% of range is a 32.5% freq; if you 4b JJ+ plus some bluffs (like 5%), you would be 4betting ~12,5% of the times, so your fold to 3b would be 100- 32,5 - 12,5 which is 55%, a std fold to 3b for solvers :).
Yes, I pretty much got since I was saying 40% rfi. I'm more curious do you think it is tight to open such range? Have seen good regs (nl500-nl5k) opening much wider, because they show up with hands which isn't making in 40% range.
Thanks for answer, and sorry to bejingsnake guy for derail (:
Is that some sort of rng in the top right corner of every table? If so which kind of software is that & could you post a link? :)
Thx for your content.
Hey Daroxxx,
It is in fact a RNG, and it is an option from the Stars Helper, you can create the formula in this part of the program:
awesome video man...love the live play..
Glad you like it :D!
35:16 where you give up the river, is this a spot you're happy to just admit you're completely under bluffing and playing super exploitative? We still have a lot of value bets and i understand if a bluff is -EV we should never make it just for the sake of "balance", is that just your thoughts in this spot? Is it not a bit dangerous to let good players see give ups like this? It just felt to me that even though lots of obvious draws missed we still have so many value bet combos and villain still has enough hands that are in tough spots vs shoves that we should just stick to our best approximation of GTO.
Good video as always, thanks!
Hi Electric_Blue,
I think given the way how my range is consctructed, I should be bluffing my combo, but in the small sample I had from Flake, he was folding only 38% on the river, and even if its not going to be a real %, it is a clear tendence, and I thought his range was made mostly by Ax, and I don't love to be bluffing in a double FD board against a player with this profile. Ingame I thought checking was a fine exploit given the reasons I mentioned before; but probly I should just bluffed this one given it is my best bluff here and he's still going to have some Jx and QQ combos.
Its very difficult when you might have so many bluffs, and you expect your opponent to bluffcatch you with a very high frequency!
Last hand btn vs bb 3 bet pot , ag ur shove pio likes calling qjdd over qjcc,qjss. Thoughts? At first unblocking diamonds seems to be the better pairs to call down with but maybe for bb to hv qjdd means btn has no jx of dimaonds which btn doe snot turn into a bluff on river so havIng jx of d is better for bb . And really nice content btw . Keep it coming
great video Juan
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.