For a player with those stats i feel like you narrowed his range to far towards his top end.

How do you see his range on the flop?

just what I would put here:
exclude QQ (at least),
input: Q+ (all TP or better, 2pair, bottom\mid sets), 5+:69+(bottom pair or better w\ gutter or better),5+:46+(OESD that has at least bottom pair to go with),346+ (all wraps)

can you post full hand or link to it (@weaktight or somewhere) so we can make a simulation w\ PJ ranges.

so, we have #A as made hand sub-range Qx,55,KK. I excluded 77-QQ as on the bord this dry it's likely he will play them differently, maybe even Q7 is more of x/r (tho, in fact, hard to say anything for sure about this type of player)
#B - any draw (OESD+) or pair+draw (TP+gutter, bottom pair+weak Open-ender)
total of 50%, hard to make it any wider here.

EV if shove OTF vs #B+ (sub range A and B) is $2.33
so, we're making money if he b\calls everything here (no FE)
but it's because we invested a lot pre. (OTF we'll have 43% vs this wider range we gave him)

obv, EV of shove goes up if we have some fold equity.
if SBs stack off range is 5+:46+,Q+,346+ (we're getting 9% of b\f OTF), then EV of shove goes up to $3.05
but, the thing is, we're behind in turms of GII equity OTF, so if it gets deeper - folding becoming more atractive option.

that's it pretty much. make conclusions yourself.
I'd say that with given depth GII is alright, vs somewhat tighter opponents or deeper stackfs (320bb+ or so) folding would be better.
we can also execute peel and stack off option, but 3\4\6\8\9\Q.. seems like too many bad runouts that I would have trouble playing at.

upd. also, if we exclude Q7+ from his donk range OTF our overall equity vs #A+#B goes up to 47% (which is significant)

regards,
Andrew

Thank you! Very good analysis!