wait are the micros still beatable? your starting with 100$ was from 3 years ago

I tested the system recently, where I left $50 on my account and ran it up all the way to 500Z. All the same things apply from before. Players still really bad. Rake is still a killer. Variance will be high since nobody really ever folds. You'll need a bit of luck to run it up, but it's certainly possible same as before.

what limit can you recommend me with a 10k$ bankroll? :)
I want to dodge the high rake because ya like you say rake is a killer.

If you know that you're beating 200Z then that's what I'd recommend. Though do it carefully. 10k is slightly on the lower end for 200Z, unless you're good about dropping down quickly if you end up losing.

ya I'm thinking like 200z until I lose 1k and then PLO100 until maybe 5k$ and then drop down to 50z. Just wanted a confirmation that my bankrollmanagment is not too aggressive here because I heard of people that recommend 200-300 buyins for PLO.

And I'm not 100% confident that I can beat PLO200 ^.^ ... haha maybe I should better play PLO100?

And I'm not 100% confident that I can beat PLO200 ^.^ ... haha maybe I should better play PLO100?

Heh. Well in that case I would recommend that you figure out what level you think you can beat, and then drop down one extra step from that. Otherwise you'll need those 200-300 BI and more :)

Jonna
Can you tell me your winrate at the micros br position? Because I really think that I have a brutal leak on SB...

people tend to overcall in sb and disrespect positional advantage or 3-bet hands that they shouldnt : ) might the case : p

i only play on the shortstack plo tables on black chip poker (same network), there are no regs, and only a few non fish, rest are all passive fish usa player. dont know how the fullstack ones are. winrate is 17bb/100 over a non relevant sample (8k) combined on pl25 / 50 shortstack table

I would think that the Rake at those short stack tables is really brutal.