readless id expect to break even on a shove. we have 41% vs JT/J3 (within a top 25% range not AA). we need about 44.5% to BE on a shove with no feq.  the more draws we add the better. i assume we cant assume that sets are in his donking range? vs JT,J3,Ahh:(K,Q,J,T) we have 42%. vs J3+ no draws we have 37%.

jamming readless seems questionable without reads unless you know your avg unknown donks wide enough so that you prefer that. even tho calling doesnt nec make the hand easy to play and we will still face a lot of tough decisions i think i prefer that.

do we really wanna 3b this pre vs an unknown when we have no pre flop stats or post flop reads?

I think it's fine without a read, but I don't love the 3bet pre from the BB (would be better from the SB). 

The jam protects our hand and assures we don't get bluffed off of the best hand.  plus we should induce some stabs on this board.  If we had AKQQ with the bdfd I might prefer a x/c since we don't have to worry about over cards.

I still like the 3bet pre with fairly good queens vs a late opener, especially at these levels where people don't play back. Flop is better check call I think. Can bluff 9s and check fold on a flush turn as that's what villain holds often.