It would be interesting to know how high his 3bet% and flopx/r% is since that tells us how many AA he flats pre instead of 3betting and how wide he's 3betting. That's very crucial here imo since he could 3bet every AA and x/r a ton which would make me like my hand a lot more than vs someone 3bettin 2% and x/r 10%.
Vs the nittiest of opponents I even let this go OTF. 

OTT I after he bets this big I think it's a shove or fold. If you think he mainly has sets, 2pair here obv you have to fold (prolly already fold OTF). If he 3bets wider and you think he would sometimes x/r A-blocker + backdoors that's to weak to x/c you can shove and gii good vs TP+the now-not-backdoor-anymore draw OTT.

River: I'm kind of confused by his check. Again, it's hard to come up with a range without reads/stats.

- value: AA,JJ, 55, AJ. I would expect a shove from the set hands since hecan't really x/f them with this SPR. OTF your calling range is way more made hand-heavy than draw heavy (only wheel or broardway wrap) so by checking he loses value from all worse made hands and still loses his stack to KQ (assuming he doesn't x/f).

- air/semibluff: Like I said it's very villain dependant how many non set/AJ hands there are in the flop x/r and turn betting range. OTR this range is always losing vs your hand if it does check -> 89/KQ will shove and all the backdoor and/or blocker hands OTF that x/raised will either bluffshove or x/f.
Conclusion: No value in shoving vs this part of the range.

So in the end I would say that we never get x/called by worse (which I know wasn't what you were aiming for) but also very rarely get better (sets or splits) to fold. 
Vs the 'avearage' 25plo reg I would prolly fold flop if he's very tight or call flop and shove or fold turn depending on how many light x/r I think he has OTF.

Thanks for your thoughts homie. I think this guy is a bit tricky so I put him in the more aggressive side of regular players.

I wasn't playing with a HUD but I'm pretty sure he 3bets most AA so I heavily discounted that, especially combined with the A blocker I have.

This is kind of separate but I think HUDs are not that useful for making decisions like these unless you have 10k hands on someone & the flop x/r stat is reliable. My opinion is that showndown hands are where we need to focus on to make good plays. Because it's not that hard to have 150 hands on a guy & he has a x/r of 20% but he had a set 2 out of 10 times & never x/r's light for example. Whereas if we had a showndown hand read that he doesn't thinnly value bet for example, that would lead me to believe he is less aggressive & less likely to x/r bluff which would be more reliable than a 20% x/r stat. HUDs have made me make bad plays before personally & I try to rely much more on showndown hands... in order to do so & not be lazy, sometimes I take my HUD off so I don't rely on it for reads.

I know any information should be helpful but sometimes it becomes information overload (for me at least)