More money in PLO than NLHE?
Posted by michaelccc0119
Posted by
michaelccc0119
posted in
Low Stakes
More money in PLO than NLHE?
I'm just an amateur PLO player but I've noticed that bad players in PLO are a lot more spewy and willing to play bigger pots due to the nature of the game. It just seems like at low stakes PLO seems way more profitable than NLHE. Just wondering what all the pro sharks' opinions are regarding this matter.
Loading 2 Comments...
I wouldn't say thaqt there is more money in PLO than NLHE. Ofc fullring NLHE is pretty dead. PLO is certainly more fun than NLHE but even if your opponents are pretty spewy you will never have the preflop edge advantage you have in NLHE. This means more variance. Rake is also pretty tough esp with the new changes of higher caps when the table isn't full. We reached a point where you have to work on your game regularly to make money longterm so if you dont want to do it professional you should stick to casual and play whatever you enjoy most.
More variance doesn't mean less profitability. Compared to NLHE, PLO has higher variance AND is more profitable, in general.
Be the first to add a comment