Well, you said he is aggro and capable of bluffing. Against him I don't mind betting/3betting or, preferably, check/raising on the flop. You are often gonna have the best hand on flop (and if not, a plenty of equity with your wrap) but your outs are mostly non-nutty, so even if you hit a straight on the turn/river you will usually improve only to a bluff catcher, which is not an ideal outcome against guys like this.

Given what you said about the villain, I put him on a range of: Top 20% of hands + 3 and 4 card run downs 6 or higher, plus any paired Ks or As, plush flush draw potential of 6 or higher, plus double pairs 6 or higher.

Preflop, this puts you at a 65% favorite.

Once the flop comes out, you are still a 66% favorite against his range with no further information.

I really don't think his $35 bet on the flop reduces his range any, so I think optimally this may be a check raise here because the decision is easy. It's only going to get more difficult to to figure out as the hand progresses, and he seems like the kind of guy that would put it all in with an over pair or an eight out draw.

Once you check call the flop, I think you have kind of committed yourself to check calling all the way down. You know the flop mostly misses him, the turn and river doesn't change that, and him continuing to bet doesn't change anything either that because it sounds like you had identified him as someone who is likely to three barrel bluff or to be betting very thin.

At the end of the day, I think you took the second best line.

With stack size of 200bb and a check raise wouldn't the turn be awkward a lot? We're going to be putting in $145 on the flop with another ~350 behind.