KJT9ds squeezed pot, awkward turnspot + linecheck
Posted by EdgeKing
Posted by
EdgeKing
posted in
Low Stakes
KJT9ds squeezed pot, awkward turnspot + linecheck
Blinds: $0.25/$0.50 (6 Players)
BB: $235.17
UTG: $154.91
MP: $76.51
CO: $50.00
BN: $52.37 (Hero)
SB: $139.18
UTG: $154.91
MP: $76.51
CO: $50.00
BN: $52.37 (Hero)
SB: $139.18
Preflop
($0.75)
Hero is BN with
K
9
J
T
, , , , , ,
Flop
($24.00)
A
4
2
, ,
Turn
($24.00)
A
4
2
T
,
opener is 65/24 opens 40~ish from every position. AFq 16%, WTSD 39 over 350 hands
CO is decent but tight reg, I assume he will 3bet the spot woth about 10-12% here, and flat another 6-8%.
I'm not sure whether shoving flop is +EV but I'd assume it makes us a slight bit of money, however I believe that our EV by checking back should be higher.
Turn we get into a rather gross spot, the passive fish pots turn pretty quickly so I assume he flopped something he wanted to go with and wants to get in his money now. I guess we don't have the immediate equity to call against that range but might have enough implieds (and great visibility) to justify a call.
Would be glad what you guys think about this spot.
Loading 2 Comments...
In the moment, I 1/2 pot fold flop and then jamming against 1 player and giving up against 2 on the turn. but checking back seems alright too. I don't like potting into 2 players though. As played I just fold the turn.
I wrote that ^^ but when I thought about it some more I don't really like the SPR with our hand and the idea of getting one of them to fold a* on he turn. I like delayed cbetting 1/2 pot here more.
I think it's fair to call the first opener a bad lag.
I'm not in love with the pre-flop sizing at 100bbs. I would 3-bet smaller for pot control for the times I get 4-bet and make flatting less committal. Post we can still get our stacks in if we want to while keeping our options more open.
I like the check back on the flop, love taking the free card here. We don't really want to gii with our hand on that board against a bad lag who will put us on aces but call anyway because he has an ace or a big flush draw. This line is great in a heads up pot and I'm thinking whether betting could be a better option in a MW? It achieves the same thing of dodging 1 street of betting but also allows us to potentially get heads up. It also allows us to control the sizing against a bad lag who likes to pot a lot.
I don't necessarily think that when the bad lag pots the turn that it means he wanted to go on the flop. Your check back makes your hand look more like KKxx so I imagine is just wants to win the pot with all of his Axxx hands. Agree though that there's a bunch of str8 and flush draws he may have wanted to go with OTF.
I'm tempted to call the turn because I think we can play rivers pretty well, but I would prefer to be deeper. In game I would probably call but math-wise I guess it's not the best.
Be the first to add a comment