I'm not familiar with using PJ at all, so I can't help you with that. I do have some thoughts about bluff-catching rivers though. In this case for example, you block a lot of drawing combos villain could have, and basically not a single made hand combo. Additionally, I think villain's overall agression (factor) is an important indicator as to whether he bluff-stabs missed rivers. In this case for example, someone playng 50/10 over 20 hands imo is way more likely to check back hands like KK, and even 9xxx with or without a missed draw. To me it seems a bit redundant to try and break down his entire river range into value-bet, check-back, and bluff portions, especially since you know so little about him and his tendencies, but maybe that's my loss :)

I would add on the calling range more J combos, so basically i think if he is that passive he would be calling bare jacks as well. I would type "J" so to include all other top pairs that dont include a gutshot. I would also add tt,qq,kk. Maybe tt:c if you reckon he calls wih t and a club blocker, im not sure. Include tt's combos accoridng to your read on him. But some of this passive players will call evern worse shit. I could exclude j9+ not necessarily only the combos that include clubs with it and also exclude apart from what you have already, wraps + FD, so 78+:cc.

I widened a bit the flop and turn calling range to include more J combos. and excluded 78+:cc in the flop (assuming he would raise that). After doin that, in ther river , in the RD module says that he will show up with a J by the river almost 22% of the time and everything else left on his range 28% . I assume the rest 50% would be his air. And in the BC module his vaue bets increase to 37% , check down to 27% and air 36%(slightly lower but depreciable). According to this, mathematically is a break even call, but if you add the argument that Ibra Cadabra said before, and take into account his passive tendencies, i lean more towards a crying fold, even though it's annoying for that price.