3 bet pot deep, turn decision?
Posted by plac730
Posted by
plac730
posted in
Mid Stakes
3 bet pot deep, turn decision?
BN: $435.88
SB: $100
BB: $200
UTG: $200
HJ: $91.03
CO: $696.37 (Hero)
SB: $100
BB: $200
UTG: $200
HJ: $91.03
CO: $696.37 (Hero)
Opponent is playing 47/27/9. He is 3 betting the button at 12% and c-bets 73% of the time in 3 bet pots. Seems to play pretty reasonably postflop despite the loose pf stats. Haven't caught him spewing in any spots yet.
Preflop
($3.00)
(6 Players)
Hero was dealt
6
8
7
4
UTG folds, HJ folds, Hero raises to $6, BN raises to $20, SB calls $19, BB folds, Hero calls $14
UTG folds, HJ folds, Hero raises to $6, BN raises to $20, SB calls $19, BB folds, Hero calls $14
Flop
($62.00)
8
4
2
(3 Players)
SB checks,
Hero checks,
BN bets $40,
SB folds,
Hero raises to $110,
BN calls $70
I go for the c/r on the flop expecting him to c-bet this board 100% of the time, although he may not bet with air given it is 3 way. Thoughts on flop sizing?
Turn
($282.00)
8
4
2
A
(2 Players)
Hero checks,
BN bets $142,
Hero folds
Not sure how likely the A is to give him 2p or a set here. Basically drawing dead to 4 outs if it did. Do we still get it in here?
Final Pot
BN
wins $279.20
Loading 5 Comments...
How about leading flop? You put him in a tough spot between you and SB, who can reopen the betting for you, should Villain call. He'll be forced to define his hand, will probably make some mistakes with an overall weak flop range, you don't really mind if he folds, you're happy if SB gives action, and nobody gets a free card.
Expecting him to c-bet 100% 3-way with the option to take a free card sounds optimistic, and betting accomplishes a lot.
This deep I like to have a lot more hands in my lead range than my c/r range. I think that a donk lead really puts the button into a tough and I am more than happy to get b/gii.
As played I think that we should probably be shipping this turn with our whole range and equity. I think that with a ~PSB left once we check we are never going to be happy with the results. If it checks through a lot of cards are going to suck. Also I am not sure how much the ace hit's villain ranges. I think that it's more likely that we get called by 89T with a BDFD than A8 types of hands. And I don't want to c/f to those hands or let them peel if they chose in position.
Yeah agree with arukidinme here. I'd only check if I expected a hand like QJT9 to float the flop x/r, in which case, x/jamming is going to be better.
If we lead this hand .. What other hands do we want to lead?
Something to b/gii: Sets, A453+, 4567+ TTP´
And then some b/f hands, that can turn good EQ if called: 8JQTish
Does it sound like a good strategy?
And to "mix it up" we could move some sets from b/x range and put it in c/x range?
This sounds about right and I think that the type of board matters when we choose to d lead over x/r. This board texture seems like the type of board that misses every one so villain(s) could be inclined to fight over it.
I agree that we want to have a mix of this range in our x/r so that would all probably come down to game flow. I would think that we could add our TTP with 2 BDFD to our x/r range since we will be able to barrel a lot more turns confidently.
Be the first to add a comment