HJ: 17k hands, 36/19, AF 2.7, CBet F 72%, CBet T 53% Relatively tighter PF, bit of a maniac post-flop. Barrels a lot, plays a lot of double suited trash.

CO: 851 hands, 56/6, AF 1.0, Fold to F CBet 53%, Fold to T CBet 44% Extremely loose/passive fish, no odd plays though, just calls way too much.

(Hero) BTN: 75 hands, 31/26, AF 2.7, Fold to F CBet 50% (2/4), Fold to T CBet N/A Fairly active, I am fairly straightforwrd with these guys, but I definitely pick my spots to bluff. HJ may see me as spewy, CO may think I'm good because I VBet thin against him a few times.

Pretty standard being IP on a huge fish and 200+bb deep.

I call to keep in weaker draws. No one has really defined their range too much. HJ is CBetting a ton and CO is a huge station.

Turn should say HJ bets x, CO calls x, BTN raises AI, HJ calls, CO calls.

HJ can pot it with a lot of hands given that we both just called the flop. He can have anything from a naked wrap to KK. Once CO calls I put him on a weak draw or a weak made hand (456:ss, AQT3:ss, etc). I ship in for the rest of my stack. HJ is calling his entire range and I expect to get a lot of folds from CO, but if he calls I should usually be ahead. Are my assumptions correct given the reads I have/provided? LMK, if you think there is a better line. I think the argument for calling is that I may get paid on some rivers by CO, but the river can be hard to play on hearts and straightening cards. I also may never get called by worse from CO and may get into this situation.

Bit of a cooler. :' ( haha