1/2plo 6max flop nut fd,flop plan
Posted by GoSu8
Posted by
GoSu8
posted in
Mid Stakes
1/2plo 6max flop nut fd,flop plan
BN: $488.14
SB: $98.20
BB: $490.87
UTG: $200
HJ: $285.30
CO: $291.87 (Hero)
SB: $98.20
BB: $490.87
UTG: $200
HJ: $285.30
CO: $291.87 (Hero)
Preflop
($3.00)
(6 Players)
Hero was dealt
K
A
7
Q
UTG folds, HJ raises to $6, Hero raises to $21, BN folds, SB folds, BB folds, HJ calls $15
UTG folds, HJ raises to $6, Hero raises to $21, BN folds, SB folds, BB folds, HJ calls $15
Flop
($45.00)
6
2
5
(2 Players)
HJ checks
Loading 8 Comments...
Preflop you can either flat or 3-bet, I think both are fine. This hand plays well multiway, but it's obviously strong enough to 3-bet also. It depends more on whether you want to invite later players into the hand or not.
Against unknowns, standard regs, sometimes bet, sometimes check and delayed cbet.
Against aggressive or good players, favor checking since they'll realize this board doesn't hit your 3bet range and you're deep enough for them to C/R you fairly liberally.
Against spewtards you might even bet/call if they'd get it in with like an open ender and a 8 hi flush draw. Generally, I like to have any pair here at least but the fact that you have 3 overcards means even one of them might be good enough if you hit.
B/3b flop I'm fairly certain is the play vs most.
EDIT: Board read fail on my part, I thought we had AA w NFD, not NFD + overs. I still like c-betting because of immediate fold equity. We also have a wrap blocker which is not insignificant. Getting check-raised is pretty gross, but can't see it happening that much based on the board and his range. We're also deep enough for him to have a check-raise bluffing range here too if he's at all aggressive, seeing as we should be whiffing this board a lot as well.
you don't say too much about the villain, apart from the fact that he's slightly loose.
given stack sizes i would lean to checking flop. you don't have enough room to maneuver post flop to bet call any sizable check raise the villain might throw at you, and your fold equity on future streets diminishes. against a 'normal' check raise range i think you're at best (roughly) a bit shy of 50/50 against a wrap or a big dog against a set.
I don't like 3betting this hand 150 deep on these positions unless villain is a donk/bad.
[Speaking about which I dont understand whats goin on here with so many people posting hands without ANY info on their opponents and expecting...I dont even know what they are expecting.]
But getting back to it, If hes a donk hes not going to CR light so you might cbet to just try to pick it up, if you get called youre most often against a semibad hand and you still have plenty outs and room for barrelling.
If he is a reg you should know hes ranges and have some reads before you ever 3 bet this hand. Whats best on this flop will always depend on that.
But generally i dont like checking back here since youre turning your hand totally face up and cannot play comfortably against his aggression after you give up the initiative. Checking back here might lead to more/bigger mistakes on future streets than you could ever make on the flop.
Pre is ok against random villains, although it sucks more when you get 4b as opposed to the same spot at 100bb.
At 100bb I'm bet/calling this all day as we have so much fold equity either on the flop or the turn with any hand and we are doing well enough once we get c/r against all but the tightest of ranges (and the players that play this tight don't connect with this board almost always). Here, though, I can consider bet/folding or checking back depending on villain, which is the key thing in this hand - how wide is he opening and how light does he stack in this spot. My default here in a vaccuum would be to check back and proceed from there, if I cbet I'd hate getting c/r at this stack depth.
How do you think random 1/2PLO villain CR range changes because of stack depth of 150bbs here? How does his CR frequency change?
Be the first to add a comment