100 6m, 200bb ip, top 2 vs flop cr and turn pot
Posted by ndahlhoff10
Posted by
ndahlhoff10
posted in
Low Stakes
100 6m, 200bb ip, top 2 vs flop cr and turn pot
None: ndahlhoff: $206.35
None: maganyosalaz: $99.20
None: profitingu: $60
None: YourNemesiss: $201.33
None: Fiskaarnn: $218.65
None: Noidea90: $122
None: maganyosalaz: $99.20
None: profitingu: $60
None: YourNemesiss: $201.33
None: Fiskaarnn: $218.65
None: Noidea90: $122
Preflop
($2.00)
(6 Players)
YourNemesiss calls $1,
Fiskaarnn folds,
Noidea90 folds,
ndahlhoff raises to $5,
maganyosalaz folds,
profitingu folds,
YourNemesiss calls $4
Flop
($12.00)
Q
2
9
(2 Players)
YourNemesiss checks,
ndahlhoff bets $9,
YourNemesiss raises to $24,
ndahlhoff calls $15
Turn
($60.00)
5
(2 Players)
YourNemesiss bets $60
Vil is 43/25, 28% agg, 11% open limp utg and 54% vpip. 41% f2cb. 18% flop cr. Agg by street (33 otf, 26 ott, 19 otr)
Two notes that aren't extremely relevant:
cold 4b 4567r, 55 bb stack
bvb call 9762 on J37r 5ss flop and turn, bluff pot otr Qsss
I was considering jam, or call and soul read/consider bluffing rivers. Maybe fold is an option as well? His range seems to be set heavy and lacking in big draws considering his line and his pf play from utg. (seems more likely his pp's will be in his small limp range, and that he'll just raise anything that can hit big draws otf, pf)
Loading 7 Comments...
As for turn, I think jamming is better than calling. I think his range is more heavily weighted to pair+draw type hands then sets.
Some PPTing will show that on the flop after villain raises we have the best made hand like 80% of the time, maybe more. This is simply because of our blockers, which decrease the chance that villain has a set to ridiculously small proportions, while all of villain's semibluffs are still in his range. The knowledge of our blockers make almost any reasonable-aggressive villain very unbalanced here. However, our equity vs villain's range is not that great, since he has a bunch of combo draws and draw+pair which we flip against or are even dogs against, so we're a little ahead or way behind. So we flat and wait for a safe turn (not that there are many of those).
Luckily enough, a safe turn indeed comes, and now all of a sudden we're doing really well vs villain's range (we even picked up a gutshot, but the analysis doesn't change if we hadn't). Villain has to keep firing with his draws most of the time in order to be able to win the hand on the river if he misses. So he bets with the vast majority of his range. Now we get to jam. We don't mind much if villain folds or calls: either he puts money when he's significantly behind, or he folds his considerable equity. In either case, folding is out of the question, and flatting is out of the question since we let villain's realize his equity.
Be the first to add a comment