I'm not that good, as you know!,lol!

But i also find it difficult with these type's of starting hands, for example when we don't have a 

3flush but we do have a pair, like in example 1 and 2.

dunno if im right, but i would set it up like this:

and i obv like to hear what and why i should play differently.

Hand 1)

K

T9

22

Hand 2)

...

89

445

Hand 3)

Q

T4

A5

Agree with Brian on all three spots

In spot 1, a ten is a pretty good kicker for the deuces and I don't like putting pairs except aces and sometimes kings in the middle too often first to act. 

2nd hand seems clear. The problem with limpinski's set is you're often going to make a bigger two pair in the middle than the bottom. It's good to be aggro in the middle and go for straights and flushes, but it can't be the primary consideration when it's such a longshot. Here's an example that makes more sense: if we have A4997 set it x/A4/997 instead of x/A7/994

The third example illustrates the power of the two-flush (which we complete over half the time if we get to see all the cards, though this is not really a usable stat because we'll often hit an ace or a five and go for pairs instead) If it weren't our only two-flush I'd put the ace in the middle. 

I like that:

Hand 1
K
22
T9

Hand 2
...
85
944

Hand 3
Q
A54
T

Join me at https://tronsuperstars.cc/ the best OFC platform ever! Uses cryptocurrency TRON, has dividends (you can "own" a piece of the company) and many frequent contests! Hit me up on telegram at https://t.me/TRONSTARS Oh and you can even play it for free on Training tables! (there are more games there too like Durak and Rock Paper Scissors, super cool)