The first hand I believe he had an open ender most likely kq maybe of hearts that's probably the only cards you can be confident in check raising. He is hoping your in love with your ace, his check on the turn might be to say hey I only have a jack to induce a bet from you.

Hand no.2 villain could have been tying to trap BB since you said his loose and aggressive and could have slow played AA KK or maybe AK I think it's a easy fold here. I wouldn't go to war with Jacks unless it was against the BB maybe. How did the hand play out?

Yep forgot about the two pair check raise. In both hands not sure I would have changed how you played them much, except maybe to check in hand one OTT.

I would check the turn in the first hand. My reasoning is that if anything the Ace gave you another way to win the pot. I feel like he could definitely be checking to induce, or checking to go over the top. I like your bet as it allows you to perhaps get a free showdown, but it opens you up to a check raise.

Second hand I would probably fold. If it were a tournament, players might jame 77-TT there, but in a cash game when they limp-shove I feel they always have at least QQ+ and sometimes, AK which you are only flipping against. Unless the opponent is a maniac that would do that just to try to pick up the chips in the middle, you have to fold there and pick a better spot.

Hey Tutor,
First hand I would check back the turn and evaluate calling river depending on bet sizing. Against just an Ahxh hands we only have 60% equity. I would call a river bet upto 1/3 size of pot against an maniac/ unknown / rec but fold against a Tag / Nit.(assuming here that our hand does not improve and no major changes on board)

Second hand is a clear fold, In a live setting the old limp re-raise especially if a guys >45 years old is a clear KK, AA or 10% AK which leaves you in bad shape with JJ mostly. I play JJ mostly as a TT or 99 in a live setting as people stack off on flops like KJx,QJx,AJx.... if you raise them after just calling as no one believes you would play JJ that way.

for the first hand: My first consideration is AQs might not be a good hand to call a 7.5x raise pre from UTG+1, if you have some read, small 3 bet maybe? Flop call is ok, but turnbet seems not necessary if you consider his check range, vs turnbet range.

Second hand: making it 35 to go from the button seems like a mistake, considering stack sizes. If u get shipped on, u have a pretty nasty decision..u get called, roughly 40% comes an overcard and u have a weird SPR...everybody folds seems like the best option albeit unlikely.

I am hardly a nit, but in a 9-handed NL game 100bb deep, both situations seems like bad spots, no reason to get there. But since you had your boots on the ground, maybe you had a different feeling that got you there..feel free to elaborate.

In both hands I think your line looks pretty standard but the thing is... In poker nothing should be standard, we are missing all the info on the player. The first hand, yes for sure u dont see a lot of this kind of action in live poker but sometimes u get crazy villain capable of that....For those who says that JJ is a fold I see every day people jamming with garbage in those spot or small pair. It just really depends on the villain.Is he able to think about the dynamic of the table given the maniac on the BB? Most of the villain in live poker dont unless they are regular... Have u seen villain going out of the line many times?? have u seen him overlimping/raising? if yes what was his hand? I think if u want to discuss/play a hand u need infos otherwise we are playing blind poker...