It is quickly possible to say that the equity of all pairs exceeds the pot odds in a spot that we are faced with a 4x bet from the villainous IP.

vs 4x 3bet we do have: 34% pot odds

Let's see:

avg 3bet V's range: 100: JJ+, AQs+, AQo+, 50: TT, KQo (66.15%% = value hands / 33.85% = bluff hands)

Equity calc

Equity
62.25% 100: JJ+, AQs+, AQo+, 50: TT, KQo }
37.75% 2s2c

Questions:

1. Should we continue to defend a tight range from UTG vs 3bet?

callin ': 99-JJ, AQs
4bet / fold: AKo, KJs +
fold: 88-22, AJs-A2s, KTs-K9s, Q9s +, J9s +, T8s +, 98s, 87s, 76s, 65s, 54s, AQo-ATo, KJo +

In micro-low stakes is it no longer worth adding pairs like 44-88 in order to just play in sets? Mathematically it is possible to defend 22+.

Well, does anyone here believe that this line makes sense? Or that it doesn't make any sense?