I usually slow down like a moron after the ace hits the turn, and then when I face a bet I cry and complain.

But on the other hand I do not think villain has too many aces in his range, or does he? Plus I feel most people would raise AK or AQ preflop and at least half the time fold Ax suited preflop, and only Axhh or A10, A6 would continue. I suppose other hands villain may have is 10 9s, 10 8s, J10s, Q10s; if he is looser than he can have a lot more 10x hands. He can call with flush draws but probably he doesn't have a lot of low cards for straight draw. And he probably doesn't have 6x or 3x hands too often either.

Maybe after he called the turn, he showing that he is not scared of A hitting turn and is most likely drawing for flush draw or slow playing set. So maybe check river to induce bluff and call river, but what if the river bet is big? Then I do not know, I think fold to a big bet.

Wonder how other people might evaluate this hand

whats your exact reasoning for betting turn and river?

I guess turn could still be for value/protection? which is already close IMO

But i dont like your riverbet. For value its too thin imo and vs this particual opponent bluffing on later streets is general not a good idea.

Depending on his river aggression i would prefer a XC or maybe even a XF...Dont expect to get bluffed too often by a lot of players while i would like to induce a lot vs the oppositt guys....But betting really makes no sense imo (dont think TX or so will call too often)

i bet the turn for thin value and x/f the river.