TPTK 3bet pot vs huge jam
Posted by blaschenfier
Posted by
blaschenfier
posted in
Low Stakes
TPTK 3bet pot vs huge jam
Blinds: $0.05/$0.10 (6 Players)
BN: $13.26
SB: $22.40 (Hero)
BB: $16.41
UTG: $5.06
MP: $18.07
CO: $19.08
SB: $22.40 (Hero)
BB: $16.41
UTG: $5.06
MP: $18.07
CO: $19.08
Preflop
($0.15)
Hero is SB with
A
Q
, , , ,
Flop
($2.66)
6
8
Q
, ,
hey guys, i only have the note that villain is 4 tabling, but i have seen him not playing a full stack, so i assume he is some kind of fish-reg. but i only have 10 hands on him.
i ended up calling, because i asked myself "why the fuck would he do that with a set on this board without a flushdraw" and assumed, that he could do it with worse Qs. i don't think he peels Q8s pre. what do you think?
Loading 5 Comments...
I'd cbet smaller and bet my entire range. Vs his sizing we wouldn't have to defend all that much. Would be somewhat surprised to see weaker Qx here. Also we have better hands to defend with.
If villain is a possible rec he can definitely show up with hands like AA-KK and of course QQ, 66 and 88, even Q8s and Q6s sometimes. You do block some of those hands but blockers dont really have much effect when villain's range is pretty much nutted. Only bluffs i could see him doing this with are 79s, don't think hes shoving this size with a gutshot or a weak Qx. Think I'd just make an exploitable fold in this case as rarely see bluffs and you have better hands to call with
Call all day every day. TPTK in a 3b pot vs a fishy player is a no brainer. Not that many combos of two pairs and I think people tend to forget how spazzy players can be at these stakes.
freenachos - I don't see any good reason to Cbet my entire range here when the board connects pretty well with villain's range.
Agreed with everything Pierre said.
I would be more scared if he raised, when he shoves all in it looks weaker. Probably calling but if he is 4tabler, I'm not thrilled about it and think it somewhat low EV call.
Be the first to add a comment