TP facing heat in SRP.

Posted by

Posted by posted in Low Stakes

TP facing heat in SRP.

.wt_rel td {font-weight: bold;}.hheader { font-weight: bold; font-variant: small-caps; font-size : 13px; color: black;}.wt_hh1{ font-weight: bold; font-variant: small-caps; font-size : 12px; color: black; }.wt_h2{ font-variant: small-caps; font-size : 11px; color: black; }.wt_t1{ font-size : 11px; color: black; background-color: #eeeeee; border-collapse: separate; border-spacing: 4px; border:1px solid #DDDDFF;}.wt_blue {color:blue}.weaktight_hand {font-size: 11px;}.wt_ul {list-style:none;}$0.50/$1 No Limit Holdem • 6 Players • OnGameGenerated by weaktight.com.UTG$178.65UTG+1$117.41CO$121.08BTN$109.33SB$186.61hero (BB)$104.13 Pre-Flop ($1.50, 6 players)Hero is BB 1 fold, UTG+1 raises to $2.50, 1 fold, BTN calls $2.50, 1 fold, hero calls $1.50 Flop ($8, 3 players) hero checks, UTG+1 bets $7, BTN folds, hero calls $7 Turn ($22, 2 players)hero checks, UTG+1 bets $18 Final Pot: $22

Villian is 22/19.3.7 over 1.1k hands. WWSF 59. Raise 1st from MP is 22 %. He cbets 70 % and 75 % på turn.

Whats your plan on turn here?

5 Comments

Loading 5 Comments...

WM2K 11 years, 11 months ago
Pretty easy fold I think. Villain bet into 2 players on a bad board and has a stronger range to begin with. MPMehKicker is severely compromised here and you def can t call a likely river bet. Best to let go of it early then late.
James Hudson 11 years, 11 months ago
Agreed somewhat but all of villain's stats point to him being loose and aggressive giving his bets a lot less weight. He's opening 22% from MP, cbetting 70% on the flop and 75% on the turn with a WWSF of 59. I think I'd call turn and fold a bunch of rivers.
From02Hero - 11 years, 11 months ago
disagree :-)
first off i think a good point WM2K mentioned is villain cbet into 2 players on a very wet board which is obv. not good to cbet bluff in general, even worse multiway.
further i think we should not interpret too much into villains cbet stats in general facing this 3way spot + bad cbet board..
de.pokerstrategy.com
Board: Jd9c7cAh
Equity Win Tie
MP2 68.33% 65.36% 2.97% { JJ+, 99, 77, AQs+, A9s, KTs+, QTs+, J9s, T8s, 97s, 86s, AcJc, AcTc, Ac8c, Ac7c, Ac6c, Ac5c, 6c5c, Ac4c, Ac3c, Ac2c, AJo+, KJo+, QTo+, AcTd, AcTh, AcTs, KcTd, KcTh, KcTs }
MP3 31.67% 28.70% 2.97% { QsJs }

we need 31% equity for a breakeven call on the turn which - if the range i`d assign villain for 2barreling get`s kinda close - our turn call itself might be breakeven. but the fact we can hardly ever call a riverbet (which shud be very likely vs our perceived weak range). therefore i think calling the turn in a vakkum might be close to BE but since we wanna have a multi street plan i think calling the turn becomes -EV.

had this hand happened in a HU pot we obv. face different ranges which is why a turn call will imo be + EV in that scenario.

Be the first to add a comment

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy