Tough spot vs Reg NL2
Posted by GutsDuty
Posted by
GutsDuty
posted in
Low Stakes
Tough spot vs Reg NL2
Blinds: $0.01/$0.02 (5 Players)
CO: $0.33
BN: $2.14
SB: $2.01 (Hero)
BB: $2.67
UTG: $3.44
BN: $2.14
SB: $2.01 (Hero)
BB: $2.67
UTG: $3.44
Preflop
($0.03)
Hero is SB with
T
T
, , , ,
Flop
($0.44)
5
4
8
,
Turn
($0.78)
5
4
8
K
,
River
($1.72)
5
4
8
K
A
, ,
Final Pot
UTG wins $1.63
Rake is $0.09
Rake is $0.09
What should I have done?
Loading 4 Comments...
What do you think? Where's the confusion?
Betting the turn is likely fine, getting a bit more value from 66/77/99, protection from stuff like AQ and facing a raise is not a huge concern given the board.
And river I would just fold, it's hard for villain to come up with bluffs given the action and the runout (no missed draws).
Thanks, I'm sorry if this was so simple, I'm learning and i had a doubt that's why I exposed the hand
Don't apologize! Any question that you have, someone else will have too. Asking those questions is what this forum is for.
I agree with Samu and Mancuso. I would bet larger on the flop, and I'd fold the river, although it's close if he's very tough.
There aren't any legitimate draws for villain to play this way, but he could have 77/66/87s. I suspect most 2nl players won't bluff with hands like those, but if he does, the combos will add up fast compared to what is going to be a narrow value range - not many value hands make sense outside of the flop slowplays.
As played pre, you might CB a little bit larger on the flop due to TT vulnerability, maybe around 50% to 66%.
As Samu said above, I don't mind stabbing the turn, you have FE and protect your equity.
Once he called on turn, I'm giving it up on the river.
Be the first to add a comment