top set/ quads playin passively? missed value?
Posted by Gay Theory
Posted by
Gay Theory
posted in
Low Stakes
top set/ quads playin passively? missed value?
Blinds: $0.02/$0.05 (6 Players)
BB: Viprake: $5.17
UTG: gaucan: $5.00 (Hero)
MP: Abrapard: $5.00
CO: Hidalgo66: $6.15
BN: OVIOAN907: $7.21
SB: RudousekUtaty: $5.04
UTG: gaucan: $5.00 (Hero)
MP: Abrapard: $5.00
CO: Hidalgo66: $6.15
BN: OVIOAN907: $7.21
SB: RudousekUtaty: $5.04
Preflop
($0.07)
gaucan is UTG with
T
T
, , , ,
Flop
($0.77)
2
8
T
, ,
i think raising dont make sense, neither donking since its super dry and no need protection, and he might bet kinda wide vs check, but will continue kinda tight vs donk probably...?
obv my range is stronger on this board since he proly not 3b 22/88/TT... but more like idk... QQ+/AK ?
obv my range is stronger on this board since he proly not 3b 22/88/TT... but more like idk... QQ+/AK ?
Turn
($1.67)
2
8
T
2
,
he might be checking some AA/KK if he is balanced... dont think JJ-QQ checks often... . so i guess avg 5nl player after xbehing will has like overs only.. nothing else... or sometimes some random 66 that he decided to 3b pre from boredom
River
($1.67)
2
8
T
2
T
,
now his range looks like some kind of weak SDv , but a lot of AX like AK AQ... mb even wider... A5s for 3b bluff pre... etc.. and i dont think he folds them even vs 1/2p... so i guess i should be betting there... but what sizing will still Ahigh call?
Loading 7 Comments...
I think it's contradictory to say that he wouldn't 3b 88 but might 3b 66 out of boredom. I would assume he is flatting these and when he xb turn you can just about definitively rule out sets and over-pairs. I wouldn't worry about whether or not he's checking back turn with a 'balanced' range it's all about getting value at these stakes so when he xb his range is capped to hands that either want to bluff river or have some small sdv imo (8x being the top of his range). I think the hand is played fine and your decision as to whether to bet river comes down to your opponent.
Regarding your specific question, i would bet the most i think my opponent is likely to call. You could probably make it 1/2psb or slightly more and still expect a call down from A high at 5nl.
Villain shouldnt bet himself OTR once he checks OTT. So I would just lead. I dont even mind leading turn as I never have a 2 here and I look so bluffy.
I would lead flop to start with - it's a very good board for you.
As played, I'm also betting river - I don't expect any bluffs, and we don't want to see a XB from his pairs/Ahi.
dats tru its better board 4 me, but doesnt dat mean that still check more EV than bet? the only reason why bet is gut , to let him raise me super wide, but if he dont, then its less EV.. and i dont think he would raise often ..
People as those limits dosen't value bet thin enough, so just keep the betting for yourself. It's pretty obvious he got a bluffcatcher so therefore I would bet the river big, with my entire range.
why betting big is good vs weak range?
saren answer plz
Be the first to add a comment