I think you are taking things too far here.
First of all: dont care about your redline at the micros. Your money will come from players playing weak ranges and paying you off with worse hands mostly.
The hands you post make me think that you dont take positions into account enough making your decisions.
Lets take a look:
1) seems ok to me given the whide ranges. Keep in mind that we have a disadvantage in 88/99 and maybe even 2x. But still ok
2) we have a decent disadvantage in Qx-combos here and have 2 FD on the board. So we need to be careful which bluffs we choose.
Also got to keep in mind that you 3bet vs UTG and face a pretty strong range. So imo AK is not a great choice to bluff even with As.
H3) : villain has 88-QQ in his range, but shouldn’t have 2p. And given the backdoorequity and AQ beeing fairly low in our range, i guees mixing X and bet OTF is ok. But if we bet we need to move on fairly careful: folding to a raise or give up turns.
H4) this one looks close…AJ has some SDV i guess in these postions. We block some folds with Jx, but we also block TP decently. So i guess a mix of checks and bets is fine. But i wouldnt triple off here.
So overall we might take a closer look at the ranges we are playing against and think about our range and possible bluffs to choose from to not overbluff spots that players could be aware off that they are overbluffed. But otherwise i would say that you didnt punt here :)

It seems just varience. I've played and beat Nl 10 and Nl 25 Zoom on Pokerstars in these last couple of months and it does seem like they really love to x/shove a lot on turns in 3Bpots (but when I call them, they somehow always have it). I played very aggresive in the begining and now checking back some very strong hands has paid off. It's also about the opponents you are playing against (on GG being no Hud, it's a little harder to tell, but just take notes whenever they take these lines and especially when you get to showdown).
I think you played fine and it's just varience.
I mainly study with solver as well these days, but do take a lot of exploitative lines, especially against opponents who fold too much, or start being very agg vs checks.

Hand #1-Not a fan of the 3b pre. This is a mix vs a GTO SB RFI range (@43% of hands). In reality, these pools are raising first in 30 to 35%. We 3b to generate folds. We generate less folds vs a tighter RFI range. Would simply call it pre.

Like checking turn on the board pair/flush close turn. We can't catch up vs boats and we simply don't want to bet into flushes here (getting raised off our redraw equity vs flushes sucks in this spot).

Hand #2-Stuff like KQo and some of the AQo should really be folded vs SB 3b here. I think most micro players are going to have more AQo and KQo in their range than they should. I think they will almost always have AQs and KQs here (3 combos). If we introduce more offsuit Qx here, betting AK becomes substantially worse. I can see them having 10+ combos of KQs/KQo/AQs/AQo. This spot gets nasty on K/A turns.

If I did c bet here, I would be checking turn because of the above.

Hand #3-Fine with line, could go smaller on rainbow texture.

Hand #4-I can get behind checking flop or betting flop. He has a ton of Qx in his range.

You mentioned redline concerns in your original post. In the above hands you put in 1.4 buy ins worth of chips and folded them off.

It seems as if you are forcing a bit in the pursuit of improving your redline and this is proving to be counterproductive.

If I may ask, what is your bb/100 in pots that don't go to showdown? Simply filter your entire database for 'Saw Showdown = False' and what is your bb/100?

But villain still has AQs, KQs in his range. I'm looking at hands from solver perspective, at least triyng to.
The funny thing is that if I would post a second hand and I would check on the turn, people would say that I should have bet lmao.
It's almost -10bb/100. lol