SQZ Pot vs Aggro Fishy Reg
Posted by PokerVagabond
Posted by
PokerVagabond
posted in
Low Stakes
SQZ Pot vs Aggro Fishy Reg
We're both roughly 100bb deep. (still can't figure out how to import PP hands properly)
dealt to Hero [ Tc, Kc ]
Player3 calls (0.10)
Player4 folds
Player5 folds
Hero raises 0.40 to 0.40 on the btn
Player1 raises 1.15 to 1.20 in the sb
Player2 folds
Player3 folds
Hero calls (0.80)
* Dealing Flop * : [ Ac, 3s, 4s ]
Player1 bets (0.65)
Hero calls (0.65)
* Dealing Turn * : [ 3c ]
Player1 bets (1.19)
Hero raises 8.86 to 8.86
No stats as playing on party and had the villain labeled as super aggro, at least at the time. I think against any other opponent then this would be a mandatatory fold preflop but this guy had been aggresive for a while and I felt it was just 'too good' to fold at the time. OOP it would be an easy muck, but in position against an aggresive laggy fish I think I could justify a call.
When villain bets 1/4 pot on a 2 flush board, my instinct is that it's normally incredibly weak. This guy could have 78s,JTs etc etc. Having the backdoor nut flush and the backdoor straight draw, I felt it was just enough to continue, looking to make moves on certain turns and put underpairs to the test.
When the 3c comes on the turn I was in too minds on what to do after his 1/4 bet yet again. I simply dont think many decent Ax hands would bet this small again, maybe just AA and AK that I block. Initially I thought raising was mandatory but maybe not after I have thought about it more and with us getting just about the correct odds. Anyway I raised but the sizing gave me problems away from the table. Smaller or just jamming? seeing as I would probably would be commited if I came in for a raise, depending on what I made it.
Eitherway I just decided to ship it to get folds from all his underpairs, and maybe even some of his weaker A highs.
Would love to hear peoples thoughts
Loading 4 Comments...
Hey
Not a mandatory pre-flop fold whatsoever against anyone imo.
Flop perfectly good call I think.
Turn I don't like, you got the nut flush draw and I'd say you probably want to bluff with weaker flush draws instead as KT has some SDV and you need some spades on your turn calling range for when the spade comes on the river.
I fold pre vs the 3bet. Post flop play is really suboptimal, turn should be a flat call. If you want to play this exploitatively just raise the flop bet? Very hard to determine with no stats and no showdown hands.
Pre is pure continue, mixed between call and 4b, in all solver ranges I've seen. So against aggro reg folding is probably a mistake.
Just saw that this was an iso raise so pot is a bit bigger. Probably closer in that case, but I'd still continue most of the time.
Agree with others that NFD has too much showdown value to bluff with. You beat some of his bluffs as is and are getting a great price.
I don't think you have a value raising range on this turn. All your value hands are slowplays and I don't think you should have many/any slowplays on this flop. I guess you have some combos of AQ/AK that might wait to raise turn, but you have worse flush draws in your range to balance with.
Be the first to add a comment