Running a sim: EV of mix strategy lower than rangebet??
Posted by Freenachos
Posted by
Freenachos
posted in
Low Stakes
Running a sim: EV of mix strategy lower than rangebet??
So I ran this sim with 74 flops on button vs big blind. I wanted to make a spreadsheet to compare strategies across different textures. In one sim I gave GTO+ the option to bet 33% and 66% on the flop. On the other I nodelocked on all textures (same sim) to bet range for 33% so I could compare the EV difference on different textures and see if i could make generalizations on different textures. So far, so good.
But then I came across a few boards where the EV of a rangebet is slightly higher than the EV of a mixed strategy. I figure it's because of the 0.5% target deviation from EV that i've chosen to run the sim with? Can somebody confirm this?
Loading 6 Comments...
When I encountered that situation my thought was that average pot in a strategy was bigger hence rake made it worse even if captured EV could be better. Not 100% sure however.
Pretty sure this has to be the explanation.
Right?
Sam grafton video
In this video he talks about different bet sizing's. He as well mentioned it is not possible that EV of 2 strategies(33,70) be lower than 1 strategy only (33). If Pio recognize it( that range bet is higher EV) he will be only using it and never choice 70%. So EV gonna be ''same''
I believe you had some technical issues in your results, maybe node locking broke something or ....
Make sure you check EV in very first node (even before BB checks).
It's mainly on boards where GTO+ (the one i'm using) is allready using a 90%+ cbetting strategy for small sizing. The minus difference is also microscopical. I think it probably is the deviance I selected in the solver.
pot size?
EV of betting range and EV of mixed strategy?
these are easy maths
0.5% of total pot = deviation u can have
Be the first to add a comment