Rivered nut flush on paired board 200NL Zoom
Posted by Walnuts87
Posted by
Walnuts87
posted in
Mid Stakes
Rivered nut flush on paired board 200NL Zoom
Hi all
Just would like some opinions on this spot. It's 6-max 200NL ZOOM, my stack is 300bb, villians stack is 100bb
I open A4ss to $5.43 from utg +1, Villian in HJ 3 bets to $16
He is a 22/18 player with 12.5 3bet
Flop is QsKKs
He bets 1/3 pot,I call
Turn is Ad. It goes check check
River is 6s.
I check, he bets 150% pot. Whats the best action?
Loading 6 Comments...
Hey Walnuts87
Everything up to the river is obviously standard and fine. On the river we will be facing a value range of AA, AK, QQ, KK, all with reduced frequencies of course. The HJ might potentially be able to bet this large with JTs, however I doubt the straights do a lot of checking on the turn, so we can assume he has so few of those they become irrelevant. We basically want to pick out hands out of our checking region that best block the AKQ and unblock his JJ,TT and maybe 99 region which he will be using as bluffs. We will have some AK and a bunch of AQ which make the most obvious calls. I am guessing we mostly just end up check-raising flop and leading river with our KQ combos, so we can ignore those for now. Out of our remaining hands (which will be mostly Ax) I believe the way this will work is the lower our kicker, the higher EV our call becomes (again because JT9 will block his bluffs), so I think the A4s will make one of our best bluff catchers. We might be able to finds folds with some AJ and AT depending on how wide we defend our underpairs both preflop and on the flop.
Cheers.
Is calling 3b w A4s standard here? I would 4b/fold.
Same here Hova. Krzysztof Slaski are you calling here just due to the 3 bet not being particularly big?
Yeah pretty much because he made it so small. Facing a 10bb raise I would shift the wheel aces into pure 4bet/fold. (Also I am assuming this is HJ vs CO 3bet since UTG+1 in a 6max game would be HJ)
Thanks for the detailed response. I ended up, after a long tank, mucking. I added in KQ to his value range and felt the amount of value he had was just a little too much. Looking back on it, I get your point completely, we had a very nice bluff catcher. I guess it was just a close spot (imo) that could have gone either way. Is a fold terrible or just not optimal?
Definitely not a super high ev spot, so I don't think the fold is gonna cost you a lot of money at all. We will probably just be allowing him to make a little too much with his bluffs if we fold this. I would also sometimes expect to just see an A that was trying to get us off a chop, but not super often.
Be the first to add a comment