River Value Bet Turned 3Bet Bluff
Posted by Dan Quinn
Posted by
Dan Quinn
posted in
Low Stakes
River Value Bet Turned 3Bet Bluff
SB: $28.07
BB: $33.65
BB: $33.65
Villain is unknown to me and isn't on any of the other 3 tables I'm playing on. He was sitting alone on one table in the lobby and I sat less than a minute ago.
Preflop
($0.35)
(2 Players)
Hero was dealt
T
Q
SB raises $0.50 to $0.75, Hero calls $0.25
SB raises $0.50 to $0.75, Hero calls $0.25
Flop
($1.10)
2
Q
A
(2 Players)
Hero checks,
SB bets $0.66,
Hero calls $0.66
Turn
($2.42)
J
(2 Players)
Hero checks,
SB checks
River
($2.42)
9
(2 Players)
Hero bets $0.40,
SB raises $3.00 to $3.40,
Hero raises $9.99 to $13.39
PS: I haven't played since BF so I may suck. :D
Loading 5 Comments...
Second, I'm not a heads up player, so I'm not in touch with any of the trends.
It seems to me one of three things is happening on the river:
I'm going to make the assumption he close to never checks back the turn with anything better than A8? And probably bets the weaker Ax hands something like half the time? He's probably also betting his turned flush draws a majority of the time.
1) he's been induced to bluff
2) induced to value bet light with a hand that was scared to bet the turn but beats us, or
3) the river gave him a strong hand.
in case 1 rebluffing him has just as much value as calling. This part of his range seems pretty wide if you induce any river bluffs as nearly his entire range of air makes it to the river in this fashion.
in case 2 turning our hand into a bluff 3bet gets a lot of folds. The problem is his range for thin value hands that make it to the river is so narrow already before even considering his thought process would have to be to go for thin value with a pot sized river raise on a river card that doesn't improve this part of his range. This seems even less likely given he would have to have displayed a tendency against going for thin value by checking back the river He also has to decline the deliciously priced bet size with his moderate show down value. This range seems almost non-existent.
in case 3 almost no matter what his cards are that improved on the river, 2 pair, straight, flush draw, I think it's a spot where at lower stakes people are going to talk themselves into a call because psychologically they already feel we're trying to be tricky from our lead, and feel this part of their range is so disguised by their turn check we can be trying to bluff them off. So reraising is just burning money here. This range is pretty thin here too: a passively played turned back door flush draw/T8, 99, Q9 and J9.
It seems like it's a pretty easy call once he raises the river.
Given the above assumptions, he's unlikely to be raising with a straight or better, meaning his range should be capped around Q9 like 80+% of the time?
So, is he folding J9? If it's very likely, great play... especially since he'll also fold bluffs (which is huge if your alternative option was folding)
I think calling may be an option though too. His range to cbet flop and ck turn is extremely wide/weak, so he's pouncing on a block bet often enough to pick him off I think,
I do agree that villain's range is pretty capped (although not completely) in that he's going to have nut hands very seldomly. Although I do think he does have them a significantly non-zero % of the time. It's important to note that at these stakes, a lot of players tend to think one street at a time. Sure, he turns a flush draw.. but Hero's hand looks very much like AX, and thus likely not folding to a turn bet. For some players, this is enough to make them check back the turn with 86ss.
That being said, I think my river play is to chk/raise and expecting to have it chk'd down the majority of the time. It's early in the match and even if it's marginally +EV for you to bet, it's very possible that it's even +'er EV to get to see his hand at showdown. If it's chkd down he shows up with 77 or 63o, you instantly learn a ton of information about a villain you're currently very uninformed about.
Be the first to add a comment