RFI vs PFR. Which one is better to construct ranges?
Posted by abstractdude
Posted by abstractdude posted in Low Stakes
RFI vs PFR. Which one is better to construct ranges?
I have a databas of roughly 400.000 hands of nl10. In my All Player report (stats for the player pool as a whole) usually the RFI number is higher than PFR. For instance in BTN the PFR number is 23.28 but the RFI is 37. Same with CO with a PFR% of 19.80 and RFI of 25.13 (and so on with similar gaps for every position).
Which one of these stats is more helpful to infer ranges from in your opinion?
Loading 2 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.