Imagine a HU game. Lately im thinking that when i defend my big blind by calling im making a mistake splitting my range in the same way (more or less) against opponents with quite different cbets flops range compositions.

In general terms, i see 2 differents kinds of opponets:

A) High cbets% flops (70%+). 

This regs tend to "bluff" some decent showdown value hands on differents boards. Ie. cbet ATo on 962r. This kind of opponents tend to make his range on later streets weaker, because they are cbeting too many hands on the flop. They usually have low/weak cbets turn% if you compare them with his flopcbet%. I see that most of this players folds a lot of flop check-raises, and if they dont they spew a lot.

B) Balanced cbets% flops ( 40-50%).

I think this is the most difficult reg to play, you have to be worry on protect your check-calling range with a lot of strong hands since his flop cbet% is quite strong, and you need came to the river with most of your best combos. He is also checking back some flop pairs, giving up some % small portion of his range if he knows that i hitted hard on some boards.Ie. K92r, he is checking back hands like ATo, or K3.

Id like to hear some advices of how would you split your own ranges in order to exploit this two tendences. I think that against opponent A i need to split my range xRaising a lot (checkraise TPGK sometimes, 2pairs+ with a big frecquency, and not be worry too much of making my xCalls weakers). And against opponent B all the oposite.

What do you think ?