Random thought on 10nl and below
Posted by Wodgy
Posted by
Wodgy
posted in
Low Stakes
Random thought on 10nl and below
Has anybody actually had a thought like this before.
You see tables with 35+% vpip 6 max tables with queues and 25%+ vpip 9 max tables with queues for obvious reasons.
But being as most regs/multi tablers at these limits are "bad" or "learning like us" I think it can be as profitable to sit at reg tables exploiting there tendencies and giving a "fishy" image.
I regularly sit at tables like these and play even as high as 39%vpip 33%pfr and notice a considerable win rate.
Any other thoughts on this?
Regards.
Loading 5 Comments...
Maybe you can win at nl10 with 39 vpip.
Though it is "well known" you will not be able to win with 39 vpip at nl50 and high. People will 3-bet shit out of you, if you start to defend very wide, you will lose even more postflop.
But you may try anyway to play with this vpip while you are winning.
I understand this. I mean, the average micro reg at 10nl and below mainly utilises an ABC TAG/Nit approach and I feel regs can be just as profitable to play against as fish at these limits
If the question is "do i have to table select at micros to win money", the answer is no. As to regs at micros, if they were good they wouldn't play for month at those stakes.
I've seen a Matthew Janda video in which he says that vs Tight players you should play loose and vs loose players you should play tighter (this is common sense i guess), but vs players who are way too loose the best approach is playing loose yourself.
They are called Reg fish for a reason. Your logic is sound but you need to be very disciplined post flop since you are playing hands that can be dominated.
Be the first to add a comment