Posted by Damian Copeland
Posted by
Damian Copeland
posted in
Low Stakes
CO: $218.95
BN: $100
SB: $224.45 (Hero)
BB: $108.20
UTG: $234.15
HJ: $214.80
BN: $100
SB: $224.45 (Hero)
BB: $108.20
UTG: $234.15
HJ: $214.80
Preflop
($1.50)
(6 Players)
Hero was dealt
Q
Q
UTG folds, HJ folds, CO raises to $2, BN folds, Hero raises to $7.50, BB folds, CO calls $5.50
UTG folds, HJ folds, CO raises to $2, BN folds, Hero raises to $7.50, BB folds, CO calls $5.50
Flop
($16.50)
7
T
3
(2 Players)
Hero bets $11.20,
CO calls $11.20
Turn
($38.90)
7
T
3
5
(2 Players)
Hero bets $19.20,
CO raises to $41.60,
Hero calls $22.40
River
($122.10)
7
T
3
5
J
(2 Players)
Hero checks,
CO bets $72.40,
Hero calls $72.40
Final Pot
CO has
6
6
Hero has
Q
Q
Hero
wins $263.40
Loading 5 Comments...
Thanks!
The above might have gone through villians head in some way given that OPs sizing also looks quite unbalanced and I would therefore also like to to add that I definitely think you should increase your sizes (flop is about fine) but turn is just waaay to small, I tend to think of the sizing I would go with topset.
From a exploitative standpoint you can obviously play around with smaller sizes to induce spazz like this or light calldowns and then perhaps go bigger with toprange and bluffs and then go FOS-sizes with your "medium" valuerange or something like that but in general as you move up in stakes I think having perceived balanced betsizes is a really good idea.
FWIW I have at 200nl seen a lot of my fellow regs have socalled splitranges according to their sizing. This happens when stacks get deeper in a 3b pot since they are so used to the 50%ish at 100bb stacks and they just tend to forget to adjust their sizing as stacks get deeper, its quite cool to exploit!
-igotya
Be the first to add a comment