Pretty interesting spot wanted to see what other think about the hand
Posted by vanity02
Posted by
vanity02
posted in
Low Stakes
Pretty interesting spot wanted to see what other think about the hand
BN: $100.91 (Hero)
SB: $108.50
BB: $111.79
UTG: $167.23
HJ: $100
CO: $260.06
SB: $108.50
BB: $111.79
UTG: $167.23
HJ: $100
CO: $260.06
Villain is playing about 18/15 Fcb 60 flop x/r 17, do not have a large enough sample for river x/r
from what I've seen so far hes a TAG fish, folding alot in the blinds at 82-100 from bb and sb WWSF 64
3bet 3%
from what I've seen so far hes a TAG fish, folding alot in the blinds at 82-100 from bb and sb WWSF 64
3bet 3%
Preflop
($1.50)
(6 Players)
Hero was dealt
7
7
UTG folds, HJ folds, CO folds, Hero raises to $2, SB folds, BB calls $1
UTG folds, HJ folds, CO folds, Hero raises to $2, SB folds, BB calls $1
Flop
($4.50)
K
7
8
(2 Players)
BB checks,
Hero bets $2.37,
BB calls $2.37
standard cbet
Turn
($9.24)
Q
(2 Players)
BB checks,
Hero checks
Normally I barrel turn to get value from Kx, but for this specific opponent i decided to check back and play my hand passively. Reason being is that his x/r is pretty high and since he did not x/r flop I can pretty much eliminate alot of Axhh and t9s from his range. I decided to give him a chance to bet river so i can raise for value since it seems he is pretty aggressive wwsf is 64 flop raise/x/r stats are both high.
River
($9.24)
6
(2 Players)
BB checks,
Hero bets $4.50,
BB raises to $19
I was expecting a x/f by him, but when he raises what can I get value from by going over the top?
I know this sounds like a stupid question, but would like to know if people would still raise when knowing that villain is bluffing OTR since there is no play after. If villain is never calling when hes caught bluffing vs the off chance that he does have the nuts once every blue.
Loading 19 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.