Poker Snowy considerations
Posted by Heisemberg91
Posted by
Heisemberg91
posted in
Mid Stakes
Poker Snowy considerations
Hi guy. I would like to know your opinion about Poker Snowy. I know that CREV is better but for easier and faster Hand review you think that Snowy could be an ok option? If not why? thanks all
Loading 12 Comments...
why u think crev is better
Because it is ;D
did threads said so?;p
What would provoke such a comment?
Honnestly I dont know threads view on snowie.
Trolling? =oP
Snowie should be used as a tool, to see what a computer would do imo.
It doesn't explain a thing it does, so in some ways this could be used very counter intuitive if not used right. So a big part of using Snowie is being able to interpret the information correctly.
I think there are allot of better option out there, especially for $30 a month (which is the only option to get the range analysis, the best part imo) and will add up very quickly.
That said I think everyone could improve there game from working with it to some extent.
I thought it's strategies vs short stackers were very useful.
Another cool feature is actually being able to play vs Snowie, which I used to help strengthen my hand reading.
Flopzilla is a very powerful tool, which comes with HoldEQ for free, and for the price of 1.2 months of snowie you get to keep!
do u mean some article about shorts, or u did manually made a lot of scenarios vs shorts ? can u give some example of scenario that u found worthy ?
i have both pro snowie sub and flopzilla too
The ranges and size's it uses vs different size starting stack. Also what it does postflop on different textures.
well snowie is limited in sizes for 1/2p pot 2pot, so how did that helped u in term of sizing?
It adjust sizing for stack size, yes the sizing is very limited. But I guess I should of emphasized starting stack size.
FWIW
The solver betta should be ending soon for CREV
Probally the last month, if anyone was trying to put work while it is free with CREV
I don't know what there plans with it is, anyone?
CREV and Snowie seem two completely different animals, and so comparisons are difficult.
CREV suffers from Garbage In / Garbage Out in my opinion. Yeah, I trust it to give the correct answer based on assumptions, but I do NOT trust myself to input the assumptions correctly. And it is hard to self analyze where I am wrong. And I have heard (trying to recall where) that the equilibrium tool (or perhaps the max exploit) may be flawed. obviously will try and figure out who and where I found that, (or if I got it wrong) am thinking Asuth - Alex Sutherland either on CR or his website GTORB.
The Snowie program does not give the why, and it might be easy for some to extrapolate the incorrect reasons for plays, and lose more playing that way. In the Challenge feature it also assigns all players as "Snowie Opps" so you cannot really practice 'real life' tables. Only 'balanced' ones (they are trying to get away from claims of GTO )
I can see no reason why folks would not want both?
which
imo if u can beat snowie, u can beat RL tables.. the most useful is range advice that u get only in pro sub or monthly sub, im riding dis horse on monthly subs so far 3 D: but im not using it too much lately but probably will start, i just had to hunt bonus and other shit
if wanna go over snowie in some spots, add me skype:gaucan
Be the first to add a comment