Well, imo your stats look pretty reasonable...

Just asking about the 4b stat...is it % or range? Range would be way too high i guess esp. for NL100 what ive seen the last months. Or maybe im just too nitty :)

Cbetting stats look fine, too imo...

But there is some important stats missing that go hand in hand with your SD stats and could be usefull...stuff like XR/F2XR (or fold CB to raise in general stats) and ofcourse your Fold to Cbet stats street by street. Cauze my (not too deep) experience so far of NL100 is that lowering your own CB stats and calling down more(as you already mentioned) is a pretty usefull strategy at these stakes. And there is still a lot of fishes (like me) that still CB too much and can be punished pretty well by XR light. THese numbers could give you a wink about your kind of low WTSD and WWSF stats i guess

Your stats look pretty solid to me, but I don't play much 6m these days. I think you are better off posting hands you are in doubt about, rather than stats, when nothing seem completely out of line. Posting positional stats would also help as there are tons of different ways you can get your 22/18.

A good tool for checking how your stats stack up is PT4's leaktracker. It's worth playing around with to see how far from the 'norm' you are. As the other guys said I don't think your stats look bad at all. WWSF is normally a bit below 50% especially if there are a lot of multiway pots going on. The key thing is to get max value from the pots you do win.

i think you have pretty tight turn/river c-betting stats. It's more likely your not bluffing enough in those spots. 

*grunch*

It looks like you're playing too tight (likely not opening enough from steal positions), potentially folding too many rivers or flops, not barreling enough on turns and rivers, and generally being too passive post flop.

This feels like the redline question everyone asks, "How do I get my redline positive?" 

bb/100: 2.87 Does it really matter?  hehe j/k But to answer in all seriousness. If you feel like your not bluffing, aggressive, calling down etc... Try reading some GTO stuff or practice balancing your ranges if you don't already, I think when I first started practicing this it forced me to bluff more, barrel more and sometimes hero call when I normally don't. But because its a "balanced" strategy, your exploitative nit style will balance itself out eventually where stats are lower than normal.

But if it isn't broken why fix it? I would take another shot at 200nl, if you said you ran bad maybe your style does work at 200nl and you probably wont need to fix anything.

Another thing is exploitative vs balanced what I like to call sword and shield hehe, when playing tougher regs I try to play the most balanced style(to my knowledge) so they never have an edge on me and can not exploit me until I start trying to exploite them(which is usually never lol) but against weaker regs it works wonders and I always straight up exploit bad players.