Normal tables or zoom, which format is better for my long term growth?

Posted by

Posted by posted in Low Stakes

Normal tables or zoom, which format is better for my long term growth?

Hi guys so I know that similiar questions where already asked in this forum and while I agree that normal tables are more profitable I am still not convinced if they are also the best option for my long term profitability. Zoom is tougher and it really teaches patience to you. Also I get tilted a lot more in zoom because the money doesn't come as easily. Not sure if that is good or not :D...

Of course being a bit tilted is bad for your winrate which can cause you to bleed money and eventually tilt more but maybe zoom can teach me to improve my mental resilience?

I estimate my winrate at normal tables to be well over 10bb/100hands maybe something like 13-14bb/100hands.
At Zoom I'm also not doing too bad with 10evbb over 30k hands (tilt spew included) which leds me to believe that I don't sacrifice much by playing Zoom in terms of hourly BUT do I gain something in return? That is the questions.

So should I rather grind nl2 normal tables make a few hundred bucks move up to nl5 rinse and repeat or play zoom make some money too but less and with more effort, post a lot of hands and study?

I'd appreciate it if you would like to share your opinions

Pokerlogical (2 days tilt free)

Loading 2 Comments...

Be the first to add a comment

You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.

This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy