nl50 simple question about a strat otf
Posted by Limp Limpson
Posted by
Limp Limpson
posted in
Low Stakes
nl50 simple question about a strat otf
Blinds: $0.25/$0.50 (6 Players)
BN: $23.00
SB: $50.00
BB: $55.37 (Hero)
UTG: $141.75
MP: $50.75
CO: $50.00
SB: $50.00
BB: $55.37 (Hero)
UTG: $141.75
MP: $50.75
CO: $50.00
CO is 19/18 over 500 hands
BTN is 39/25 over 36 handsxploit passivity of regs and their unwillingness to raise without the nuts)
BTN is 39/25 over 36 handsxploit passivity of regs and their unwillingness to raise without the nuts)
Preflop
($0.75)
Hero is BB with
5
7
, , , ,
Flop
($4.75)
2
Q
3
, ,
Ok, so we have few options otf, which one do you prefer?
1)lead all sets, twopairs (32s, but that might not be a defend) and weaker fds, xc NFDs and Qx
2)xr sets, twopairs and weaker draws, xc Nfds and Qx
3)xr sets twopairs and weaker draws, lead NFDs and Qx (to force CO to play honestly and iso the rec if he whiffed)
4)just fckin lead everything and let them deal with that
5)xr sets, twopairs and NFDs, do smth else with weaker draws and Qx (I noticed that there are conflicting philosophies re: raising ranges with draws)
I tend to think that xc with nfds becomes more valuable when A high has sdv, so in this case it would make more sense to build the pot with strongerr draws and just xr. What do you think?
1)lead all sets, twopairs (32s, but that might not be a defend) and weaker fds, xc NFDs and Qx
2)xr sets, twopairs and weaker draws, xc Nfds and Qx
3)xr sets twopairs and weaker draws, lead NFDs and Qx (to force CO to play honestly and iso the rec if he whiffed)
4)just fckin lead everything and let them deal with that
5)xr sets, twopairs and NFDs, do smth else with weaker draws and Qx (I noticed that there are conflicting philosophies re: raising ranges with draws)
I tend to think that xc with nfds becomes more valuable when A high has sdv, so in this case it would make more sense to build the pot with strongerr draws and just xr. What do you think?
Turn
($10.75)
2
Q
3
8
,
River
($16.75)
2
Q
3
8
K
Im jamming $15.5
would you play the T/R similarly? turn sizing is very exploitative obv (trying to exploit passivity of regs and their unwillingness to raise without the nuts)
So, main questions:
1)preferred flop strat? Or would you choose smth else?
2)be aggressive nutted or non nutted draws? I presume that we cant be aggro with all draws, since we dont have that many valuehands. We're prob overbluffing as it is, but I think thats fine vs described villains.
3)are turn and river fine?
thanks guys:)
Loading 4 Comments...
"4)just fckin lead everything and let them deal with that" X/raising implies that villain will bet too frequently IP and either fold to often or fold too often on later streets. If we dont gain any fold quity, x/raising with draws just means building pot voluntarly with 7 high.
On the other side we wnat to portect our x/folding range by checking many different hands.
thats potentially not that important multiway, isnt it?
I think you can just mix it with x/r and donk bet . Depends on raiser open range and flops . Also here CO is nit i guess and maybe he cbet only with HAND when fish in pot ...then you have no FE and you need bluff turn + river = cost a lot of money . but he can fold on river with all his Top pairs. i think also depends on you , if you aggro maniac in his eyes and here is no flush on river ,he more likely call you..
Donk bet looks more ez to play i think ,he gonna fold all his air right now + you still have FE , you will not donk with trash vs TWO ppls in pot .
Not sure why you worry about balance on 50nl ? i mean just don't go crazy and dont BETbet bet only nuts
Be the first to add a comment