NL5: Was I too passive?
Posted by trickypostflop
Posted by
trickypostflop
posted in
Low Stakes
NL5: Was I too passive?
Blinds: $0.02/$0.05 (6 Players)
BN: $9.25
SB: $8.44
BB: $10.58 (Hero)
UTG: $9.47
MP: $5.00
CO: $5.99
SB: $8.44
BB: $10.58 (Hero)
UTG: $9.47
MP: $5.00
CO: $5.99
Villain here is a reg with pretty tight stats of 17/10/5 so his UTG range should be on the tighter side
Preflop
($0.07)
Hero is BB with
J
K
, ,
Flop
($0.32)
5
J
2
, ,
At the time I elected to flat as I believed we are ahead of most of his range.
Turn
($0.62)
5
J
2
8
, ,
River
($1.18)
5
J
2
8
9
, ,
I'm pretty sure as played river is a fold. Please let me know if you think otherwise.
I'd like other opinions on taking a more aggressive line OTF and OTT. Should I be x/r here almost every time?
I did some basic calculations in Equilab giving villain a tight-ish range of hands that he would call a flop x/r with which gives us 50.2% against his entire range which includes his sets, TPTKs, FDs and overpairs.
Please let me know if I was a big nit :) and feel free to perform your own simulations (if this hand interests you enough/you are bored enough).
Loading 3 Comments...
Check-calling flop and turn is fine and better than x/r here. As you analyzed yourself, by raising you isolate yourself against a very strong range of mostly overpairs, TPTK sets and NFDs and only fold out worse hands than yours.
Your line is well played and river seems like a good, disciplined fold against these super nitty stats of villain.
Cheers bud
Fold preflop. Villain is a nit and you are OOP.
Be the first to add a comment