NL5 AK IP in MW
Posted by venatici
Posted by
venatici
posted in
Low Stakes
NL5 AK IP in MW
Blinds: $0.02/$0.05 (6 Players)
CO: $10.35
BN: $7.53 (Hero)
SB: $6.15
BB: $5.64
UTG: $4.60
MP: $3.31
BN: $7.53 (Hero)
SB: $6.15
BB: $5.64
UTG: $4.60
MP: $3.31
UTG is a weak reg 26/17 over 50-ish hands
MP is a fish 52/4 over 100 hands
CO is 24/6 over 70-ish hands
SB is 23/9 over 80 hands
MP is a fish 52/4 over 100 hands
CO is 24/6 over 70-ish hands
SB is 23/9 over 80 hands
Preflop
($0.07)
Hero is BN with
K
A
, , , , , , , ,
Flop
($3.20)
J
3
6
, , ,
I see no reason betting here with so many players, even in position.
Turn
($3.20)
J
3
6
K
, , , , , ,
Decided for a 1/3 pot, not sure if sizing here shouldn't be much bigger?
From so weak players draws should call anyway and I believe my TP is often best at this point.
From so weak players draws should call anyway and I believe my TP is often best at this point.
River
($5.42)
J
3
6
K
2
, ,
Now I think that sizing could be greater. KQ should call 70-80% of the pot anyway and draws fold anyway.
Loading 4 Comments...
I would bet bigger ott and try to shove a lot of rivers.
Its fine. If you were heads up on the flop size should be bigger in nl5. But with so many villains I think sizing is ok.
Some Kx, especially strong Kx will lead the turn. We're 4way in a pot, I doubt KQ would check very often, but you never know at 5NL. I would make the turn sizing bigger, getting value from Kx, Jx and flush draws. (65-75% ish) I think the river could be larger too getting value from Kx (75%). Fish love to call big bets when flush / straight draws miss.
If we bet bigger on the turn, we can shove most rivers hoping to get called by Kx.
Villains seem loose passive, thus likely to call too wide, we exploit that by valuebetting big.
That was well played but river should be 75% bet atleast imo.
Be the first to add a comment