(NL2)Doing well on 6 max regular tables, but doing really poorly on zoom

Posted by

Posted by posted in Low Stakes

(NL2)Doing well on 6 max regular tables, but doing really poorly on zoom

I understand that regular tables are more soft, but I don't get it, why this big of a diference?
What could I be doing so wrong?

3 Comments

Loading 3 Comments...

antihero 7 years, 7 months ago

Your sample size is basically meaningless but have a look here:
http://www.runitonce.com/chatter/joe-ingrams-take-on-zoom-vs-regular-cas/

mfutoma 7 years, 7 months ago

You'll probably need at least 100k hands before being able to compare the two. At that point if there's still a stark discrepancy, I'd say it's because 1) The games are tougher in Zoom as you said, or 2) The lack of reads in Zoom is causing you to play poorly.

Hope this helps.

Aggro Squid 7 years, 7 months ago

Even at 100k sample your bb/100 win rate can vary by at least 2bb/100! I won't post link but try googling 6 max variance calculator and runnning some sims

Be the first to add a comment

Runitonce.com uses cookies to give you the best experience. Learn more about our Cookie Policy