NL25z OOP bluffing OTR after cbet and X/X turn
Posted by downflux01
Posted by
downflux01
posted in
Low Stakes
NL25z OOP bluffing OTR after cbet and X/X turn
Blinds: $0.10/$0.25 (6 Players)
BN: $26.09
SB: $25.00
BB: $80.56 (Hero)
UTG: $12.34
MP: $64.15
CO: $10.93
SB: $25.00
BB: $80.56 (Hero)
UTG: $12.34
MP: $64.15
CO: $10.93
Unknown vil
Preflop
($0.35)
Hero is BB with
7
6
, , , ,
76s is one of the SC I have in my 3b range BBvBTN, think thats reasonable
Flop
($6.10)
8
2
T
,
Its a somewhat dry board, but Id rather have a bigger sizing strategy here instead of 1/3, because I think he will continue less often with hands that he should be continuing with (like some overcards + BD FD). And in that, I think my GS+BD FD fits pretty good in the "bluffing" range for that
Turn
($12.20)
8
2
T
J
,
Pretty stupid card to continue on, a lot of his continues improved to pair+draw here or twopair, were not even happy with our 9 if it arrives any longer, since any Kx has us beat, so I check.
River
($12.20)
8
2
T
J
Q
,
I think we can discount some stronger Jx, two pair and sets from his range after checkback, think those bet for value v our AQ/AK. He will have hands though like some AQ floats, two pairs .. but I would target those, because I feel like people are too sticky even with big sizes here. So Id bet half pot in hindsight to get some weaker pairs to fold (KT, AT, A8, some PPs that decided to flat OTF) .. we may block some of the folding range, but I think its mandatory to bet here, since we will rarely have worse.
Loading 4 Comments...
IMO pre is somewhat meh, but ok. small SCs get too much credit for "good playibillity" esp. in 3BP oop. But i guess its fine (at least at lower frequencie).
But i guess i would X flop. The board is more dynamic than it looks like in a Blind vs BU-Scenario. All backdoors are heavilly teinted and im fearing reverse implied odds+low FE here.
As played: I like the idea of bombing this 1.5x+ OTR
How do we block any of Villains folding range with 67s? thats 2PPs only and i guess any onepair hand has to fold and any 2p has a really tough decision to make.
We still have a ton of QQ/AK and 9x in our range and Villain is heavilly capped to 9x for the best.
If we have a player that isnt capable to fold two pairs/toppairs here, im probably just half potting it to get him off weaker pairs. But I guess people should find a fold even with their twopairs here if we overbet, and then thats better
Yeah feels like a mandatory bluffs OTR to me. Stone bottom range, you can have plenty of straights. I think you are allowed to bluff any 0 SDV hand here, since you should have so few of them. Like only 67,56 and some wheel Ax bricks this board.
RaoulFlush
I agree pre, it's a mix in theory probably like 50/50 call/3b. Im not a regular at this stake, but i would recommend a very tight strategy and lean towards 3betting instead of calling especially against big opens. Will be abit more high variance in the short run, but adapting to the very high rake should be more important. Look to take down pots pre, and play strong ranges.
I agree that 6/7 blockers are not essential. I guess you could block one combo 79ss wich is good.
I would jam this, and maybe have a small size with QQ and some straights.
Be the first to add a comment