I 4bet something like 6.30. This may look not so much of a difference, but people will react more predictable and straighfoward which means they way more often and I wont have these awkward spots. Same goes for flop bet.

min donk 4bet: 5.50, flop bet 3,70 = 9.20 ---> 6.30 way cheaper o 4bet bluff with a size that doesnt induce so many calls.

We also have to use this size for QQ-AA and ak, which sets up strange SPRs OTF and villain will a) lose less if he peels flop than if we would have 4bet bigger b) will not attempt to 5bet bluff shove because he can see a flop that cheaply.

I just don't think you need to make it as big as $6.30 to achieve the same goal, namely threatening his stack and defending appropriately to his 3bets with your range. You also lose the ability to play a 3 street game postflop if you decrease SPR by that much. Of course some spots will be easier to play because you narrow ranges down by so much that they become more and more defined. But as I stated above, you can't bluff as much because this gets quite expensive then (even more so if you chose to cbet) and you won't get as many bad calls with the value portion of your range because you lay him a worse price.

That said, I don't like shoving the flop with anything at all really. I don't think he folds or should fold an overpair there and I think my FE will be way higher if I bet $3.70 with this and jam a K turn.

I prefer calling pre, i can't see what calls us with worse when we 4bet and we weaken our flatting range a lot if we're 4betting this.

As played b/f flop is fine. Vs any made hand here we have <30% so he has to be bluffing tonnes to make some kind of play back profitable.

Wp

I don't understand why everyone thinks this is a clear fold.

If we jam and villain calls with JJ-TT then we have 27% equity with AcQs so we will lose 11.50 on avg. If we fold to his raise OTF we're going to lose our 4bet+cbet for a total of 9.20. The difference is not that big imo and we're certainly tougher to play against if we jam.