nl200, set vs river ch-r
Posted by Ry4eek
Posted by
Ry4eek
posted in
Mid Stakes
nl200, set vs river ch-r
Villain: 4k hands, raise 1st MP - 16%, cbet - 67/59/17, check-raise river - 20(5), WTSD: 29, W$SD - 49
What is the optimal betsize on the river? Your thoughts on the river? Usually there is always the nuts.
Loading 4 Comments...
I think your bet on the river should be more like $70 or even bigger, since your value range is probably just boats (I think AQ is too thin to value bet because you would then likely be betting wider than you would call). So since you have a lot of strong hands in your betting range that want to get value you want to bet big and add bluffs accordingly to stay balanced.
I think it's fine to fold 33 to a raise in that case since it's the bottom of my value range, and is therefore one of my weakest bluffcatchers and we have enough nuts to call vs air.
One thing I just thought of is that if he has Kx, 6x or Qx he blocks a load of our bet/call range so it might be really profitable to c/shove those but he probably doesn't show up with much 6x, and Qx is his best bluffcatcher so he probably won't shove it.
I agree that in game this is always the nuts from most peo
I like the hand all the way down. And I don´t really get the argument, why we should bet hugely when our value-range is boats only. I mean, what weak hands are we credibly repping? I like the sizing.
With a big bet we're repping a polarised range containing bluffs and boats.
What kind of hands may we bluff for balancing on the river?
Be the first to add a comment