It seems weird to me that you'd ask if we can value bet but then check fold to a half pot river bet. I think I'd probably shrug and call river given that we don't have a ton of hands that can bluffcatch after betting flop and checking the next two streets. Also, villain can be bluffing with AQ type hands, have checked back some flush draws on the turn or even maybe value betting a hand like 910dd. Also, them some good pot odds...

Seems close., but I expect most TP+ combos to bet the turn. I would probably bet sth like 27$ (blockbet/thin value) and hope for a hero.

As played, I don't think we can fold -we're going to have so many give ups here + Villain might XB->bet his draws occasionally or vbet worse 9x.

I much prefer a river check/call rather than a thin value bet. I doubt you have many bluffs that take a bet-check-bet line on this board so I think it's best to protect our river checking range which is tough to have a high frequency of as it is.

Could be a busted draw or some k high a high typ hand which try to fold you of a weak pair.

I doubt we can value bet. Against 88 or 66?

I think I'd probably shrug and call river given that we don't have a ton of hands that can bluffcatch after betting flop and checking the next two streets.

I doubt you have many bluffs that take a bet-check-bet line on this board so I think it's best to protect our river checking range which is tough to have a high frequency of as it is.

I agree with those arguments, thx a lot for helping me!