NL20 - QQ 3b pot as the aggressor - SBvsBTN
Posted by urak
Posted by urak posted in Low Stakes
NL20 - QQ 3b pot as the aggressor - SBvsBTN
IPoker, $0.10/$0.20 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.
Hero (SB): $21.83 (109.2 bb)
BB: $24.18 (120.9 bb)
UTG: $21.06 (105.3 bb)
MP: $20.40 (102 bb)
CO: $22.71 (113.6 bb)
BTN: $21.54 (107.7 bb)
Preflop: Hero is SB with Q Q
3 folds, BTN raises to $0.40, Hero raises to $1.60, BB folds, BTN calls $1.20
Flop: ($3.40) J 4 J (2 players)
Hero bets $1.20, BTN calls $1.20
Turn: ($5.80) 3 (2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $2.90, Hero calls $2.90
River: ($11.60) 4 (2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $5.80, Hero calls $5.80
Results: $23.20 pot ($1.54 rake)
Final Board: J 4 J 3 4
Hero mucked Q Q and lost (-$11.50 net)
BTN showed Q J and won $21.66 ($10.16 net)
villain is a regular, who is also calls 3b ip @ BTN: 50%.
On this flop I cbet 100%. (This is good?)
What is the better play ott? b/f or ch/call?
I think if we ch/call turn, there is a good chance that Villain will bluff on the river.
If we b/f turn, Villain will call worse pps (so he can't check back with them). If I b/f turn, I b/f river too.
Also his bet ip vs missed cb stats in 3b pots: f:40, t:30, r:33.
Raise vs cbet in 3bp: 5.
In retrospect maybe b/f would be better, given Villains low betting tendency ip, after a check. I'm not sure.
Loading 1 Comments...
Be the first to add a comment
You must upgrade your account to leave a comment.
This thread has been locked. No further comments can be added.